Etre malade quand on enseigne [fr]

Avant d’être enseignante, j’ai travaillé dans le secteur privé. J’avais un joli salaire, je bossais 4 jours par semaine (80%), je sortais régulièrement en semaine. Arriver au boulot un peu fatigué quand on travaille dans un bureau, c’est pas top, mais au pire on n’est pas très productif. Idem lorsqu’on est malade: soit on reste à  la maison et le travail n’avance pas, soit on va quand même travailler et on fait de son mieux.

Quand on enseigne, tout ça devient très différent. Pour commencer, on travaille plus et on est payé moins (eh oui!) Je sais, on a plein de vacances, mais on en a besoin (j’vous jure!) et on choisit pas quand on les prend. Manque de pot, elles tombent toujours durant les vacances scolaires…

Ensuite, je crois qu’on n’imagine pas, si on ne l’a jamais fait, à  quel point il faut être en forme pour enseigner valablement. On peut plus ou moins faire le zombie au bureau si on n’est pas dans son assiette, mais essayez seulement de faire le zombie devant une classe d’ados! Donc, si on est en train de couver quelque chose, pas question de se laisser aller. Il faut faire tourner le moteur à  plein régime et assurer.

On n’est vraiment pas bien? On songe à  se faire porter pâle? On hésite… Oui, on hésite, parce que d’une part il faut préparer le travail que feront les élèves pendant qu’on se bourre de PrétuvalC ou de NéoCitran, et d’autre part, on sait que les choses seront toujours plus mal faites par le remplaçant que soi-même (malgré toute la bonne volonté de ce premier). Il faut souvent reprendre une bonne partie de la matière quand on revient. L’équation commence à  prendre forme? Arrêt maladie = plus de travail. Ce n’est pas parce qu’on est malade que l’école s’arrête de tourner et que les élèves rentrent chez eux (quoique parfois, devant la pénurie de remplaçants…)

On attend donc en général que notre état soit bien avancé pour en arriver à  cette solution de dernier recours: se faire remplacer. (En plus, parfois c’est un collègue avec des heures de blanc qui s’y colle, et on sait tous à  quel point c’est désagréable…) Mais une fois qu’on est vraiment bien assez malade pour se faire remplacer — c’est-à -dire qu’on n’est plus capable de grand-chose — il faut encore préparer le remplacement! Eh oui!

C’est trop cool, prof, comme métier. Tant qu’on ne tombe pas malade.

Ce soir à Genève: Nuit du Journal Intime [fr]

[en] I'll be in Geneva tonight to talk about intimacy in the era of blogs and the internet. I'll be sharing a panel with a bunch of pretty famous people, so I'm a little intimidated.

Je serai à  Genève ce soir pour participer au débat intitulé “Du journal intime au blog, que reste-t-il de l’intimité?”, dans le cadre de la Nuit du Journal Intime. Je vais me retrouver entre Catherine Millet (La vie sexuelle de Catherine M.), Willy Pasini, et Catherine Bogaert. Un peu intimidée de me retrouver en si jolie compagnie!

J’en profite pour faire une petite mise au point concernant le fameux titre de “meilleur blog suisse 2003“. Je croyais l’avoir déjà  fait, mais impossible de mettre la main dessus, il me semble que le moteur de recherche de mon site est un peu boiteux. (Oui, y’a du boulot.)

Bref, en 2003, une petite équipe de blogueurs francophones décide de lancer les Blogs d’Or. J’en connaissais la plupart de réputation, et je fréquentais à  l’époque des gens qui les connaissaient. Suite à  une remarque de Delphine Dispa, une catégorie “meilleur blog suisse” avait été rajoutée. Les blogueurs avaient ensuite proposé des candidats au titre de “meilleur blog xy”, puis avaient voté, parmi les blogs retenus, pour ceux qu’ils préféraient.

Comme il n’y avait pas beaucoup de blogs suisses, et qu’en plus j’étais souvent la seule suissesse que les personnes votant lors de ce “concours” connaissaient… il faut relativiser quelque peu ce titre. Ce n’est pas comme si on avait rassemblé tous les blogs suisses, et que des blogs suisses, pour en sélectionner la crème de la crème — comme cela sera d’ailleurs fait d’ici le 5 mai 2006 pour les Swiss Blog Awards.

Disclaimer: on m’a demandé si j’étais intéressée à  collaborer à  l’organisation des Swiss Blog Awards. J’ai malheureusement dû refuser, faute de temps gratiné d’une jolie collision d’agenda.

Tags and Categories are not the Same! [en]

[fr] Les tags et les catégories, ce n'est pas la même chose. En bref, les catégories forment une structure hiérarchique, prédéfinie, qui régit l'architecture de notre contenu et aide autrui à s'y retrouver. Les tags sont spontanés, ad hoc, de granularité variable, tournés vers le partage et la recherche d'information.

Update, Sept. 2007: when I saw Matt in San Francisco this winter, he told me he had finally “seen the light” (his words!) about tags and categories. Six months later, it’s a reality for WordPress users. Thanks for listening.

I got a bit heated up last night between Matt’s comment that tags and categories function the same and a discussion I was having with Kevin on IM at the same time, about the fact that Technorati parses categories as tags.

I went back to read two of my old posts: Technorati Tagified and Plugin Idea: Weighted Tags by Category which I wrote about a year ago. In both, it’s very clear that as a user, I don’t percieve tags to be the same thing as categories. Tags were something like “public keywords”. Is anybody here going to say that keywords and categories are the same thing? (There is a difference between keywords and tags, but this isn’t the topic here; keywords and tags are IMHO much closer in nature than tags and categories).

Here are, in my opinion, the main differences between tags and categories, from the “tagger” point of view.

  • categories exist before the item I’m categorizing, whereas tags are created in reaction to the item, often in an ad hoc manner: I need to fit the item in a category, but I adapt tags to the item;
  • categories should be few, tags many;
  • categories are expected to have a pretty constant granularity, whereas tags can be very general like “switzerland” or very particular like “bloggyfriday“;
  • categories are planned, tags are spontanous, they have a brainstorm-like nature, as Kevin explains very well: You look at the picture and type in the few words it makes you think of, move on to the next, and you’re done.
  • relations between categories are tree-like, but those between tags are network-like;
  • categories are something you choose, tags are generally something you gush out;
  • categories help me classify what I’m talking about, and tags help me share or spread it;
  • …

There’s nothing wrong with Technorati treating categories as tags. I’d say categories are a kind of tag. They are special tags you plan in advance to delimit zones of content, and that you display them on your blog to help your readers find their way through what you say or separate areas of interest (ie, my Grandma will be interested by my Life and Ramblings category and subscribe to that if she has an RSS reader, but she knows she doesn’t care about anything in the Geek category. (By the way, CTTS is not a good example of this, the categories are a real mess.)

So, let’s say categories are tags. I can agree with that. But tags are not categories! Tags help people going through a “search” process. Click on a tag to see related posts/photos. See things outside the world of this particular weblog which have the same label attached. Provide a handy label to collect writings, photos, and stuff from a wide variety of people without requiring them to change the architecture of their blog content (their categories). If you want to, yeah, you can drop categories and use only tags. It works on http://del.icio.us/. But have you noticed how most Flickr users have http://flickr.com/photos/bunny/sets/ in addition to tagging their photos? Sets aren’t categories, but they can be close. They are a way of presenting and organizing things for human beings rather than machines, search engines, database queries.

To get back to my complaint that WordPress.com does not provide real tags, it’s mainly a question of user interface. I don’t care if from a software point of view, tags and categories are the same thing for WordPress. As a user, I need a field in which I can let my fingers gush out keyword-tags once I’ve finished writing my post. I also need someplace to define and structure category-tags. I need to be able to define how to display these two kids of tags (if you want to call them both that) on my blog, because they are ways of classifying or labeling information which I live very differently.

Am I a tag weirdo? Do you also perceive a difference between tags and categories? How would you express or define it? If categories and tags are the same, the new WP2.0 interface for categories should make the Bunny Tags Plugin obsolete — does it?

DailyMotion Problems [en]

[fr] Un problème avec DailyMotion, heureusement réglé. Si vous n'avez pas pu voir la vidéo où je fais la bobette derrière Robert Scoble, c'est le moment d'y aller!

You probably know I like DailyMotion. I posted some feedback about DailyMotion yesterday, and bumped into some naughty problems today.

The problem with DailyMotion is that it doesn’t have a nice forum or a real devblog like coComment where we can leave feedback. So I’m posting it to my blog and tagging it in hope it will be found. By the way, I’ve been wondering what the best place is for this kind of feedback: here or on the Cheese Sandwich Blog? What’s your take?

After LIFT’06, I put this video of Robert being interviewed online and wrote a post about it here. Unfortunately, it seems at least one of my readers is not able to view it . (I guess there are at least 20 of you out there who just didn’t tell me about it.) The message says something about a key not being valid for this blog.

DailyMotion allows you to blog your videos directly from the site. That’s neat, but as I’m a control freak, I like dealing with the code myself. Back in November I had posted a video to my other blog, so I grabbed the code from over there, adapted it (video id), and it seemed to work. Actually, that was because I was still logged in to my DailyMotion account.

I first tried adding CTTS to my DailyMotion account, as a second blog. That failed (error message, just doesn’t work). As I was writing this post, I tried logging out of DailyMotion, and actually saw the message all my poor readers have been seeing these last days! In a click of my trackpad I was able to fix everything.

So, if you haven’t seen me goofing off behind Robert Scoble as David and Marc-O try to podcast him (red wine and Apple hardware involved), now’s the time to do it! Sorry for the buggy post, and thanks a lot to Raphael for pointing out the problem to me.

Tracking Keywords: PubSub and Technorati [en]

[fr] Comparaison de PubSub et Technorati pour surveiller des mots-clés dans la blogosphère. Aucun des deux vraiment satisfaisant.

One thing I came back with from LIFT’06 is that what one should monitor is more keyword watchlists, rather than blogs. I used to have a few hundred blogs in an aggregator, but gave up using it ages ago. Too much to sift through, considering it isn’t my day job to do so.

During his talk, Robert mentioned that he used PubSub to track keywords like “Microsoft” or his name. Of course, it makes sense. Tracking topics that are of interest to you. I created a PubSub account and set up a few subscriptions to try to track things like mentions of my hometown, Lausanne, teenagers and weblogs, and of course my name. Tracking your name makes a lot of sense if you’re looking out for conversations. Think of highlighting in IRC: if everybody tracks their name in blogs, then you can just call out to them. Hi, Robert, by the way!

Now, this name thing. I guess tracking your surname with PubSub is all right if you’re named Scoble, but if you’re named Booth it makes things much trickier. I added my first name, but that didn’t help much if I omitted the quotes. And as people are likely to refer to me as “Stephanie Booth”, “Stéphanie Booth”, “Steph Booth” or even “Stéph Booth” that’s a bunch to track, but let’s say it’s manageable. But it rules out people who refer to me as “bunny” or even “Tara” (yeah, and if I start tracking those too, it’s not going to make things less messy).

What I really liked about PubSub is that it offers me an out-of-the-box sidebar for firefox. I can get a list of the recent posts containing my keywords in there, browse them, click, check, move on. It has highlighting too, and that’s really nice — helps me see straight away if the Stephanie Booth on the page is me or some homonym. (For some reason it’s not working anymore, but it was nice while it lasted.)

What I didn’t like is that it didn’t seem to be returning as many results as Technorati. Also, I wasn’t always sure if it was responding or not (I guess the current conversation around my name isn’t very busy ;-)). And the “Latest Messages” option only gave me the last three posts in each subscription. It gave me the impression of being a little incomplete in the results it returned. I suspect it isn’t really incomplete, but I can’t really nail what gives me the impression. In any case, PubSub and Technorati give different results for a search on “cocomment”

The slight unsatisfaction with PubSub made me go back to Technorati watchlists, which I had never really used. I like the idea of tracking URLs in posts. If somebody links to me, then it doesn’t matter if the person called me “Stéph Booth” or “Tara” or “la Mère Denis“, I’ll see it. I can also track links to my Flickr account and other blogs and stuff easily. Keyword searches work too. So, neat, I now have a watchlist page on Technorati with all my monitoring material. I can subscribe to each of them by RSS.

Gripes, however. And for the sake of it, let’s assume I’m hoping my watchlists will replace my NewsReader, and not go and live in it:

  • I can only expand one watchlist at a time.
  • Expanding a watchlist shows only the three last results.
  • I don’t have a compilation page with the latest results from all/any of my watchlists.
  • I’d like a sidebar!
  • Blogroll links keep showing up in Technorati search results. It’s nice to know you’ve been blogrolled, but you don’t need to be reminded of it each time you do a search.
  • No highlighting!

What it boils down to: I’d like a Technorati Watchlist sidebar for FireFox and highlighting of search terms or URL in the pages which are loaded from it.

Do you monitor keywords, URLs or search terms? Do you use PubSub or Technorati? Do you stick the results in your feed reader to keep track of them?

Update: of course, I’m much more familiar with Technorati, so there might be something about PubSub I’m missing completely. Feel free to educate me.

How Will CoComment Change Our Commenting Habits? [en]

I was really excited to be able to talk about coComment yesterday Saturday night, and I really think it’s a great service, but I never thought it would pick up as fast as it did. As I heard Robert saying at LIFT, the blogosphere is not about how many people read you, but about who does, and how things scale and can get out of hand once the masses get hold of them.

CoComment is already changing the way I participate in comments (conversations!) on other blogs. I feel more connected. I feel like it makes more sense to leave a comment on a blog I scarcely visit, because it’s not a message in a bottle anymore: I have an easy way to get back to it. CoComment makes my activity on other blogs visible, so it encourages me to be active (yeah, that’s how I am! I like the spotlights, didn’t they tell you?) and maybe more conversational.

On the other hand, this is what I see coming: more popularity for popular blogs or posts or commenters (coComment will amplify the feedback loop effect for comments). Easy celeb’ stalking. Maybe more self-consciousness about “where I comment” and “what I comment”? Comments by top commenters will have a different weight on your blog, and different consequences, because they’ll get a different visibility. A-lister X’s comment on a lowly blog may have gone unnoticed until now, but if they use coComment, it won’t anymore. Will we start signing out of coComment to retain privacy over a certain amounts of comments we make, and that we don’t want in the public eye?

I’m really happy to see coComment gaining so much popularity. I’m just a bit worried. Is this too much success/visibility to soon? I’ve seen people (gently) bitching around already about what a shame it was that coComment did not support all blog platforms, or that it only tracked comments by coCommenters. Laurent says he’s pushing to open it up on Monday night, but I wonder: is it really a good idea? What are the risks involved? What has the most potential for damage: frustrating people because they can’t yet be “part of it”, or not being able to manage the scaling, user feedback, and user expectations for a public service?

I know I’m a worry-bug, and Laurent and Nicolas are smart and know the insides of the service much better than I do — so I’ll just go and prepare my stuff for school and worry about useful things for my life just now (like, what am I going to teach this morning). All the same, guys: “Soyez prudents!”

Lift: Thanks for the Videos, but… [en]

[fr] Problème pour visionner les vidéos de LIFT avec OSX et Firefox. Et vous?

I tried to get to the LIFT videos but I can’t read them. I have the latest versions of Tiger and Firefox. I spent a minute in a pop-up configuration window (that was nasty to start with), and then it just didn’t work. Can’t we have DailyMotion-style videos that “simply work”?

Audio works, though. Would be nice to be able to download it instead of stream.

As for the podcast feed, it asks me if I want to open NNWL. A little button to subscribe in iTunes would be really neat.

Visibility is in Feedback Loops [en]

[fr] Ce qui est populaire le reste, et devient plus populaire encore, justement parce que c'est populaire. De temps en temps un pic de visibilité se présente à  nous (comme le montre l'illustration ci-dessous). Est-ce que ceux qui sont les plus connus le sont simplement parce qu'ils proposent un menu qui convient à  la majorité, et qu'ils savent tirer avantage de ces pics pour rester la tête hors de l'eau? Est-ce vrai? Est-ce bien? Est-ce mal? Qu'en dites-vous?

Last month, I had a jump in my Cheese Sandwich stats:

Traffic peak graph.

This was because the post Get an iBook! had for some reason or another made it to the “Fastest growing weblogs” list which appears in every WordPress.com dashboard. And it stayed stuck there. I think there was a bug or something and it got stuck there, but it might also have been a little feedback loop: what is popular becomes more popular because it is popular — I’ve discussed this briefly regarding a photograph of mine which suddenly became ‘interesting’ in Flickr.

So, let’s first note one thing: this little peak of traffic finally had no long-term effects for me. My traffic is back down to what it was before. Sometimes a feedback loop can send you into another playground, but most times it doesn’t. So either you try to create another popularity burst, or you just keep plodding along your way.

My second thought is that popularity, visibility, fame, or whatever-you’ll-call-it mainly has to do with feedback loops. If something is very visible, you’re more likely to know about it. Sounds stupid, doesn’t it? I think I’m coming to accept it’s a rule of the game. But to stay in the limelight once the feedback loop has put you there, you need certain qualities. Which ones? Look at the latest interesting photos on Flickr. What do they have in common?

I think you can have a great mind, great style, great many things, and still stay in the shadow if the right feedback loop doesn’t come along. Is being successful just a case of managing feedback loops and getting them to work for you? Is this bad?

I know nothing about feedback loops, actually, so what I’m saying here might very well be a lot of BS. I’ll let you decide. I’m feeling very conversational after LIFT.

CoComment enfin public [fr]

[en] Now that the cat is out of the hat and that coComments has been scobleized, I have to say I'm really very happy to have been a small part of it by putting Nicolas and Laurent in touch. You're going to love this service! All the French here is the story of coComment in the very early beginning, before the beginning of things...

C’était le 14 septembre dernier. Je recevais un e-mail de la part d’un de mes lecteurs, Nicolas Dengler. Il m’écrivait parce qu’il n’arrivait pas à  accéder à  un article que je liais depuis mon site. En passant, il me faisait part de son désir de me rencontrer pour blablater d’un projet ou deux qu’il mijotait et au sujet desquels il désirait avoir mon avis. A garder confidentiel, bien entendu.

Le samedi suivant, j’arrive avec près d’une demi-heure de retard à  notre rendez-vous au Café Luna (j’étais pas en avance pour commencer, puis j’ai attendu au faux bistrot, puis je n’arrivais pas à  le joindre sur son mobile) et on a bien failli ne pas se reconnaître. Si ma mémoire est bonne, Nicolas était quasi sorti du bistrot quand il est revenu, par acquis de conscience, voir si je n’étais pas celle avec qui il avait rendez-vous. Tout ça pour dire qu’on a passé à  un cheveu de se rater magistralement.

On a bu un thé, on a causé, de tout, de rien, de blogs, et des idées qu’avait Nicolas. Une en particulier me branchait bien: elle avait quelque chose à  voir avec étendre la logique du commentaire (de la conversation autour du contenu d’un site web) à  tout le web — pas seulement les blogs. Ça m’a rappelé une fonctionnalité qu’offrait à  un moment ICQ: on pouvait chatter avec les personnes qui étaient sur la même page web que nous, ou quelque chose comme ça. Bref, ce que me racontait Nicolas paraissait fort intéressant. Nous sommes restés en contact par e-mail (enfin surtout Nicolas, parce que je faisais une vilaine rechute de TMS et je n’étais pas très causante par clavier interposé).

Environ deux semaines plus tard, j’étais à  Genève et j’en profitais pour boire un thé (je suis une buveuse de thé) avec Laurent. On a causé, de tout, de rien, de la vie, de ce qu’il faisait.

Un jour plus tard ou même pas, Nicolas me demande si je ne connaîtrais pas par hasard une boîte fournissant un certain service (un peu à  la Technorati mais plus ciblé) que recherche son employeur, qui est en train de commencer à  s’intéresser aux blogs. Laurent m’avait justement parlé de quelque chose comme ça, je le dis à  Nicolas, ils prennent contact. La suite vous sera mieux racontée par les acteurs principaux, parce qu’à  partir de là , ils se sont mis à  la tâche (on saute quelques épisodes, je vous en fais grâce) pour donner vie à  coComment.

J’ai fait une apparition à  une des premières sessions brainstorming (et honnêtement, je n’ai pas eu l’impression d’être d’une grande utilité!) et ça avait l’air prometteur. J’ai été propulsée bêta-testeuse dès la mise en service de la première version (toute secrète), mais malheureusement tout ça tombait assez mal pour moi et je n’ai pas été super active. Je peux vous assurer que je vais me rattraper!

J’avoue que c’est très excitant pour moi de voir ce qui est en train de se passer maintenant: le projet est à  présent en bêta fermé (donc un nombre limité d’utilisateurs sont en train de le tester), il fonctionne, Robert Scoble en parle sur son blog et supplie Laurent de lui donner un code d’accès, bref, ça va décoller à  fond, j’en suis certaine. Je suis super heureuse pour Nicolas et Laurent (il y a d’autres protagonistes mais je ne les connais pas) que le bébé reçoive un tel accueil. Ravie aussi d’en faire un peu partie, et très excitée de voir ce qui va se passer une fois la phase de test terminée.

Mais bon… C’est quoi, coComment? Jérôme vous explique tout ça très bien.

Précision: quand je dis “public”, c’est dans le sens qu’on peut maintenant en parler. Ce n’est bien entendu pas encore “public” dans le sens qu’il faut un code d’accès pour faire partie des testeurs. (Merci à  Marc-Olivier d’avoir relevé l’ambiguïté.) J’ai quelques invitations si vous vous sentez l’âme d’un bêta-testeur motivé!

Wild Videocast of Robert Scoble Interview [en]

[fr] Une interview (partielle) de Robert Scoble par Marc-Olivier et David de IC Agency, filmée de façon un peu sauvage. Quand on dit que les blogs sont la télé-réalité du web...

I was having a post-LIFT chat with Marc-Olivier in the lounge yesterday when David came up, stole him from me and started talking about getting Robert to do a podcast with them for a blog they were going to open. I offered to introduce them to him.

I was going to take a couple of photographs but as they started, I decided for video instead. Think of it as a “making of” videocast of their podcast. (I say “wild” not because Robert went wild on the video but because it wasn’t planned, staged, or whatever. Vidéocasting sauvage would be how I’d put it in French.

5-minute videocast with Robert (partial)

Robert Scoble podcast (5 mins) by Steph

My initial intention was to upload it straight away. I like the immediateness you can get with the web. (If moblogging wasn’t so bloody expensive I’d be moblogging away…) David actually asked me to hold off publishing the video and cut out some bits of it or put their audio on it, because they wanted to edit some of the audio (English mistakes in the questions, but IMHO, who cares?) I said I preferred to publish what I had recorded “as is”, mistakes, goofs, and all — it was OK with Robert.

I’m a bit embarrassed by the situation, to be honest. My video is on DailyMotion under a CC-by-sa-nc license, so they can put their audio on top if they like, whatever. I don’t really like having to refrain from publishing something, but on the other hand I am very much aware that if you appear on a video or a photograph, you have a right to control publication of it. I think what bothered me was the argument of “exclusivity”. My videocast is only about a third of the interview, anyway.

What would you have done? Should I have refrained from posting this until they had their version up?

I will of course be posting the link to their version(s) here as soon as I get it.