This is often the question. In typical ADHD style, my difficulty getting started on something is only surpassed by my difficulty stopping something once it’s started. So, 9pm on Sunday night, tired tired tired, can I grab my keyboard and give you some news without still being up at midnight?
I challenge myself.
Mid-October, I went back to work part-time. Three half-days a week. It went OK but I was way more tired than I expected. Tired in general. Overwhelmed by trying to manage my weeks, that these three little half-days seemed to fill to the brim. It’s much better now and I feel ready for more. I haven’t had cognitive overload headaches for a while now, or at least, so few that I don’t remember them.
Months ago, I started using the Apple Journal app, because I was having such a hard time recalling what I had done in previous days, recent or less recent. Writing a few quick notes down at the end of the day has helped me keep some sort of grasp on all those days that have disappeared into the weird months of 2025. Recently, I’ve switched to Day One, trying it out as an alternative to Apple Journal. My Facebook suspension has made me cautious about locking data or content into hard-to-export-from apps or services.
I’ve also started learning Bridge. Maths and statistics, strategy and communication, fun! It’s an investment for my old days, but already enjoyable. I’ll write more about it in time. If you want to get started, Funbridge actually has tutorials that can take you by the hand for the first steps. Start with MiniBridge.
My very old cat Oscar is having a series of health issues. I treasure each good day I have with him, because I don’t know how many are left. The first part of the year saw a complete deregulation of his diabetes, which had been a smooth ride to manage until then. He was getting dehydrated, blood glucose going up and down like a yoyo, and slow but steady weight loss. We went through a long period of subcutaneous fluids, which helped a lot.
In September he came down with a really bad pancreatitis flare-up. I nearly lost him. An oesophageal feeding tube saved him. It sounds like a dramatic intervention, but it’s actually quite minor surgery, well-tolerated, and a life-saver. The main issue with pancreatitis is that the cat stops eating. Being able to feed by tube solves that problem, removes stress for everybody, allows proper administration of medication, fluids and calories. I had a short trip planned during that period, and thankfully a friend came over to cat-sit and take over nursing duties. I can’t thank her enough.
Since the pancreatitis he had been doing really good. He didn’t put all the weight he lost back on, but enough that it’s not a disaster. And his three old arthritic legs are happy for any 100g they don’t have to carry. I have been letting him out in the garden, closely supervised, of course, and he really enjoys it. It makes me happy too, to be able to give him access to enrichment and stimulation that an exclusively indoor life didn’t provide. It always made me a bit sad, especially as I knew he had lived most of his life outdoors. But he was too old and handicapped to risk it, and until recently, too mobile for me to supervise him in the garden here (he did get to go out at the chalet â different environment with less risks). The photo is of him on one of our recent outings.
Two weeks ago, though, he had an epileptic seizure. Out of nowhere. I moved my surveillance cameras around and kept an eye on him. He had a second one ten days later, just this Wednesday night. We put him on anticonvulsants Thursday evening, but it’s tricky dealing with the sedation side-effects, particularly on an elderly cat who is already mobility-challenged and wobbly at the best of times.
He still wants a lot of things (like me, hehe). He wants to go downstairs, he wants to climb in my lap, he wants to go outside, he wants to go on the sofa, he wants to teach Juju a lesson (Juju, by the way, is doing fine, but definitely overweight â I’m hoping his new diet will work out, because I’m not enthusiastic about preparing myself another diabetic cat).
So we’re still figuring things out, and crossing fingers that Oscar will be able to tolerate the medication and that he won’t have another seizure too soon. But it’s not good news, in any case. I’m sad and worried, which is normal, but that doesn’t make it comfortable. And also, apprehensive, because 2025 has come with more than its fair share of trials, and I’m aware that there is a high risk of Oscar dying in the coming months. And honestly, I don’t need that, just as I’m getting back on my feet. There’s never a good time for dead cats, but some are shittier than others. He might hang in there, of course, but he’s old enough and his health is such a fragile equilibrium that I would not bet on him being still around this time next year. He could still be here for months or more, of course, but he could also go downhill fast pretty much anytime. Loving and caring for an old animal is living with the certainty of grief to come, but the uncertainty of timing. I am very much reminded of Quintus’s last years.
I’ve never liked October-November. It’s dark, and damp, and not winter yet. It’s the in-between season. And this year, I had neither hiking, nor skiing, nor really sailing season. I did go out on the lake a handful of times, thanks to my dad who took me along. But it’s very frustrating and weird for me to have “lost” this year like that. It feels a bit like the first Covid year, you know, where we all felt there was a year missing in our lives. Only here, it’s just for me.
I’m way better but not “back to normal” yet. I have to put more effort into just “managing life”. And compared to before my accident, I’m much more careful about pushing myself. I used to push myself all the time. Now, when I feel tired, I go “oh, wait, I’m tired, how can I adjust my expectations for what I was hoping to do during the coming hours”.
A few weeks back I teamed up with a friend who also felt the need to get on top of her weekly planning, and we touch base once a week to go through our schedules. It’s been extremely helpful and is in no small part responsible for my not feeling overwhelmed by my life anymore. I’ve been knocking down admin tasks lately, blogging more, and even making some headway in much-needed tidying up and deep cleaning.
On the online side of things, I am sitting on my hands, because there are a few topics I really really want to dive into, but I know I cannot afford the time and bandwidth right now. It’s extremely frustrating. One of these topics is how to collate the things I share on the socials into daily blogs posts (I think I wrote about it in part 3 of Rebooting The Blogosphere). I think about it pretty much every day, because I share stuff on the socials and regret that I don’t have a simple way to round up the day’s shares here in WordPress to whip up a quick post with links and comments and some passing thoughts. There is a bunch of things I want to fix on the blog, too, but that will also have to wait. At least I’m writing.
I’ve been writing my “quick blog post” for nearly an hour, my eyes are still tired and my brain is still foggy, so I’ll wrap things up here, go and pick up my old drugged up cat, play a deal or two on Funbridge, jot a few notes down in Day One, and read my book a bit before I collapse.
Sleep is what transports you to the next day. And the next day here is Monday.
I am on my never-ending quest to squeeze more writing into my life (it’s the ugly truth â the squeezing â I know), without sacrificing anything else (I know, I know), and I’m thinking that evenings could be a good plan. The day before yesterday, I managed to eat at a decent time, and get myself ready for the night, and then have time ahead of me to write.
I repeated the feat last night, though you didn’t see it show up here, because I wrote a post on the diabetic cat website.
Tonight is not that much of a success. It’s nearly 11pm and I just want to sleep (well, I don’t, but my body wants to). What happened? First of all, I got home around 6.30pm after doing some quick shopping, already super tired because I spent most of the day on the lake with my brother and my dad. It was a lovely day. But being on water and hours of active conversation are tiring.
So, I ate a little late.
And then I got lost nearly 25 years in the past, going through an old Metafilter thread, the one where the Kaycee Nicole “affair” played out. If you weren’t blogging back in 2001, you’ll be forgiven for not knowing what I’m talking about. Whether you do or not, you should read The Curious Case of Kaycee Nicole (hat tip: ma.tt), an excellent long form write-up of what went down back in the day. I read it this morning, and it prompted me to unearth the summary I published at the time. And in there is the link that sent me down memory lane.
It’s very weird reading my old comments (I’m “Tara”) in the thread. I was 26. Just over half the age I am now. As I skimmed through the thread, reading comments here and there, I found myself reading my words without immediately realising they were mine. For a few seconds, I caught a glimpse of my online writing self from the outside. It is quite an unsettling experience.
I’ll keep it short (no writing for two hours tonight), but just wanted to mention that I activated the Jetpack related posts plugin, so you have even more choice to continue reading once you’re done with a given post. I’d actually love to have a plugin that gives you posts from the same date over the years, if there are any. I think it would be a cool way to invite people to wander around the blog in search of hidden treasure (it’s there, I’m certain).
Other than that, pretty much each time I pick up my computer to start blogging, I feel the need for what I’ve internally called the “socials to blog” plugin. The one I dream of lets me open a draft post in which my “socials of the day” (but I’d be happy with just Mastodon right now) would be pre-entered, one beneath the other, in chronological order, with prettified links and preview cards as well as a source/reference link to the original update on the socials. (Yes, I know I need to detail this a bit more.) Honestly, I think about it nearly every day. Because every day, I post stuff to the socials which I could really use as a basis for a linkbloggy blog post.
I’ve been pondering more on the nature of socials versus blogging, and it’s now very clear to me that the socials are closer to chatting than “writing”, for me. Sharing a link to the socials is akin to telling the colleague I just bumped into “oh, by the way, did you see xyz, I think you might like it”, or sending somebody a whatsapp message, or (nostalgia) hanging out on IRC. In my view, the socials are highly conversational and chatty, more spontaneous and impulsive than a blog post. Not only because of the allowed length of the updates, poorness of text editing features, and social network structure that underpins them, but also because the “stream” nature of the algorithm presenting the publications of a given platform creates a strong implicit understanding that the only relevant content is “now”. Past updates are like the newspaper of old, good for wrapping fish and chips, but not something you’d want to spend your time reading.
I remember that in my linguistics studies, we covered the distinction to be made between what we called (in French) “discourse” and “story”, two types of textual productions which differ in how strongly the context producing the text in question is present in it. (Of course I can’t find a good clear reference, I’m telling you this from memory, I’d have to go back to my textbooks to be sure more precise.) “Discourse” needs to be interpreted and understood in the light of the “real-world” event of its production, whereas the “story” has a coherence that is independent of the circumstances of its production. To give some rough examples, a novel is a “story”, but the utterances making up a phone call are “discourse”.
Within this framework, blog posts are less “discourse” than updates on the socials. On the socials, utterances (updates) lose a lot of their meaning once the context of their production fades away, whereas many blog posts can remain relevant for years if not decades. So, blogs and socials are not at all the same kind of beast, linguistically, and it would be wrong, in my opinion, to try to make one into another, or merge them. There are, however, parts of the content that makes up the discourse happening on the socials that can be repurposed into a more perennial blog post: the linklog-like stuff, for example. The prospect of doing this by hand is daunting, so I’m dreaming of a plugin to assist me in that process.
Uh oh. See, nearly an hour has passed. The mist is rolling in, up there where my brain lives. I will try and be ready for blogging earlier tomorrow night. It’s a motivating objective.
In parts 1 and 2 of this series, I covered some types of activities (reading, writing, responding, sharing) that come into play in the text-driven social web, as well as the different flavours of interaction that make up our online relations (more or less synchronous, and related to that, contribution length in those exchanges).
What this is all about is figuring out how blogging can learn from what made “The Socials” (which became the big capitalist social networks we all know) so successful, to the point that many die-hard bloggers (myself included) got sucked up in the socials and either completely abandoned their blog, or left it on life-support. I believe that understanding this can help us draft a vision for how things in the “open social web” (I’ll keep calling it that for the time being) can work, now or in the near future, to give us the best of both blogging and the socials, without requiring that we sell our souls or leave our content hostage to big corporations.
So today is part 3, which I’ve called “Integration” (initially tried “Friction”, a key part of the story), which is about bringing all of this together.
Part 1 already kicks off this idea: what the socials do really well is remove friction, in particular by bringing in the same interface writing/posting, commenting, reading. They do it really well, but inside their walled garden. If we try and start with blogging as the centre, what would it look like? Let’s try.
Start with reading
First of all: reading and following. RSS works, and we still have RSS readers despite Google almost making the ecosystem go extinct when it killed Google Reader. What we need is two things:
make it super easy to subscribe to a blog, wherever I stumble upon it â as easy as following somebody on the socials â and make it visible
from my “reading interface” (ie, the RSS reader), make it super easy to comment, share, react or link to a publication and start writing something new
Frictionless subscribe is well on the way, as far as I can see: I recently installed NetNewsWire, and since then, I can “share” any site I have open in my browser to the app (on my computer or my phone) and it will look for the feed and add it to my subscription list. The desktop and phone apps sync through iCloud. That works for me. It’s easy enough. I see a blog I like, I click twice and confirm, we’re good.
FeedLand makes it super easy to subscribe inside its own ecosystem (just tick a checkbox next to a feed you see in somebody else’s subscriptions), and has a bookmarklet, but it’s not as seamless. For example, after using the bookmarklet, I’m not “back on the page I was reading”, I’m inside FeedLand. I’m sure this kind of thing can be fixed. This is just to illustrate the kind of thing we need: some integrated way, ideally through the “share” menu (assuming it also exists in non-mac environments?), to “stupid-subscribe” to an RSS feed.
What FeedLand does that is great is make the subscriptions public, just like the people I’m following or connected to on the socials are visible to others. I can even embed them in my blog to use as a blogroll.
So, let’s say the subscription problem is pretty much solved, or nearly so. The second one is much, much trickier, and I think it’s the key to everything. (At least, one of the keys.)
In my “reading interface”, be it NetNewsWire or my FeedLand river (the “newsfeed”), I’m seeing the blog posts I’ve subscribed to. Let’s assume for now that how they are displayed is a question of user/tool preference and something we know how to do. For example, do I want to see the posts “mailbox-style” (with headers that I click on to display the post), or “newsfeed-style” (like a facebook newsfeed, with more or less long excerpts)?
Add reacting
Let’s concentrate on the next step: reacting, commenting, sharing. Can I do that easily? The screenshots above show that there is some intention in the right direction, but not enough. The desktop app gives me a share icon. FeedLand allows me to reshare inside FeedLand. I can star/like, but it remains local to the “reader software”.
This is where we need more. When I read a post I’m subscribed to, it should be trivial to:
“like” it, if the tool producing the post supports it
“comment” upon it, if the tool producing the post supports it
“share” to a tool of my choice, be it the socials, a bookmarking service, or my blog â with or without extra content on my part (I could write a whole blog post with a reference to the link in it, or I could just post the naked link to Bluesky if I wanted to)
While we are at it, I should also be able to see if there are comments visible to me, as well as likes/shares.
All this should be possible without leaving the reading interface.
Of course, this requires a slight mindset change for us bloggers: it shouldn’t matter so much if people read our post on our website or through the feed. In that respect, the feed should contain a complete version of the blog post: untruncated, with links and media. (I don’t know why I keep stumbling upon blog feeds with the links stripped out, by the way, it’s super annoying!)
So, I write a blog post with my blogging software of choice. This blog post can be liked, commented upon, or linked to (shared). I can choose whether likes and comments are active or not. This blog post is published to my blog, and in the RSS feed. In some cases, it also goes out by e-mail (not to be forgotten). Whether people read the blog post on the blog, in the feed reader, or in their e-mail, they can easily “interact” with it, where they are (less true with e-mail, so let’s leave it aside, but not forget it’s there). As the post author, I can of course choose to moderate comments before publication, so they are displayed with the blog post only if I choose to.
Maybe the feed reading software should also be capable of displaying existing comments if requested, to give context to the person wanting to comment. Or we could consider that this is where the integration ends, and where a visit to the blog post itself is in order. To be discussed, in my opinion.
There is really something about having to leave the reading space to interact with something you’re reading that is extremely problematic. Super users who juggle tabs and apps all day might not think it matters, but normal people who can’t tell their browser from the internet or a search engine will be lost. We need spaces where we can read-like-answer-share without being teleported to some strange new place without having wanted it.
Some practical considerations: let’s say we start implementing this. The technical details are beyond me, but I understand enough to know that not all blogs (or subscribable publications) will be “compatible” with the system from the get-go. No problem: grey out those interaction buttons that won’t work in the reader, and leave the link allowing the user to head out to the blog proper to comment or like. Sharing should always be possible, as each post has a permalink (at least we have that now).
Write where you read
This was for starters. Now for the first big idea: integration with the blogging software.
In other words: maybe all this “subscribing to things” should happen in the blogging tool â or the RSS reader needs to become a blogging client. Take your pick.
Here’s why. As I mentioned before, in the old, old days of blogging, blogs did not have comments. People linked to each other when they had something to respond. Some blogs, still today, do not have comments. And that is fine, it’s a personal choice. For me, the soul of the blogosphere is people reading each other and linking to each other. And we need tools that encourage that.
I think this is also something that can help fight against the “loneliness” some of us feel around blogging, compared to the busy experience of taking part in the socials. Think about this: on the socials, you’re writing your tweet, facebook post, toot, update or whatever on a page (whether on the web interface or in an app) that is filled with stuff your contacts have published. You are producing content that is going to go on and be part of this stream of updates. It feels like part of the newsfeed already. Even though everybody has a different newsfeed, it doesn’t feel like sending something out into the void. It feels like contributing to a collective space. And this is what blogging should feel like.
So my reading tool should allow for three things (at least), in that respect:
create a blog post (mention or response) based on the one I’m reading, as already mentioned previously; bonus points if it makes it easy to quote part or parts of the post (think how easy forum software makes this)
write a blog post from scratch, just like we normally do today in our blog admin interfaces (think “facebook post” here rather than “tumblr” for the vibe: a space a the top of your reading list that is there waiting for you to write a post, not nagging but inviting and tempting…)
convert a comment you are writing on somebody else’s blog post into a blog post of your own, with a link to the original post â I’m pretty certain I’m not alone in regularly thinking “I just have a sentence or two to say” and lifting my nose up after having written 5 paragraphs; happens on the socials too, particularly facebook, as it doesn’t have any character limit (this is a nice way to make blog interlinking easier)
WordPress Reader is on the right track, although it feels a bit like a rough draft (I particularly don’t like the web interface â too much empty space and not enough content). It shows the newsfeed of the blogs I’ve subscribed to, and an inviting box at the top to “write a quick post”. How the editor expands and what features it offers in this context leaves room for improvement, but the idea is there. It’s also missing easy-peasy subscription outside the wordpress.com platform, as far as I can see, but let’s note that it allows the user to switch between mailbox and newsfeed views, has a share button (Facebook and X), a repost button (which unfortunately opens the editor in another window, but in a nice move presents the reposted blog post in card format â why not?), a like button (internal to WordPress), and in-reader commenting.
Right. So far we have:
a better “reader” experience, including frictionless subscription
a more integrated way of reacting to what we’re reading
reading and writing brought together in once place.
Bring in the socials
What is still missing (the second big idea) is how to tie this in with the socials. As I argued in part 2, interaction and conversation come in varying forms. Socials do not make blogging redundant, and neither does embracing blogging again make the socials redundant. Just as we still have a use for e-mail in the era of instant messaging, or phone calls in the era of voice messages.
We touched upon this issue earlier when mentioning that any post being read should be shareable to whatever platform we want. That’s pretty trivial and already somewhat possible (we have permalinks, remember, and on our phones at least, sharing to socials is always just a touch away). But that is not sufficient.
I see three key aspects in integrating the socials with the blogging experience I’ve been describing:
Tying “comments/shares on the socials” to the relevant post (this is the neverending Trackback/Pingback/Backtype/Webmention story)
Posting blog content to the socials (POSSE) or, more interestingly from my point of view, backfeeding from the socials to the blog (tools like Bridgy and TootPress are also in this space)
Allowing the blogging/reading tool to function as a client for the socials.
The first one is an old story, but what it means is that what people are saying on the socials about what I wrote on my blog is part of the conversation related to what I wrote, and it might be desirable to have a way to point the readers of the blog post to it. It’s the argument for having comments on the blog. Or a list of Webmentions (if I’ve understood correctly that they are the Trackbacks of today). Or not. The conversation is there, and the blogger should have the ability to make it visible from the core content. Beneath a blog post, you could have comments (some made from inside an integrated tool for reading/reacting/writing, some made directly on the site), links to other blog posts which mention it, and links (or quotes? TBD) to public content on the socials about it. As I understand it, Bridgy does this.
The second one is three-pronged: I might want to share my blog posts on the socials when I publish, publish to the socials using my blog (with a separate post-type or category for example), or I might want to repost/archive on my blog whatever I have shared on the socials. The first two are outwards-going. The third is inward-coming, but instead of being centred on a piece of content (the blog post) like described above, and therefore on the content of what was published on the socials, it is centred on the person (the blogger), and therefore a specific account (or accounts).
I see two reasons for wanting to do this: first, for safekeeping (create an archive or mirror of whatever you post on Bluesky on your blog, for example) or for resharing to another audience, maybe in a slightly different form, whatever one posted elsewhere. I want to elaborate on the second case, which is in my opinion more interesting (obviously, because it’s a need I have).
I’ve already mentioned before that participating on the socials is very frictionless. The barrier is low. We are in conversation mode. It is “speaking” more than it is “writing”. Therefore, my hypothesis is that however much we love our blogs and everything, it’s still always going to be easier to quickly throw out a link on the socials, or jot down a thought, share a photo, respond to somebody and find ourselves coming up with an idea. To me, there is a lot of raw material there which might be worth preserving. Sure, if you’re having a back-and-forth about getting ready to go to the gym, maybe not, but if you’re sharing links or bite-sized thoughts or commentary on the world or whatever, that’s different.
It would make sense to be able to gather that daily production from the various socials one is active on, and organise it in what would be the “socials” equivalent of a post on a link blog. How exactly will be the topic of another post, because I think it requires going into lots of little details. But suffice to say, for now, that the idea would be to give the blogger an option to repatriate whatever has leaked from the bloggers brain to the socials in a form that could be either publishable as-is, or edited before publishing, or why not, broken down into more than one post if needed. “Today on the socials”, or something like that.
So, at this point we want to be able to create a two-way path between the blog and the socials, to push posts to the socials, bring back commentary or mentions to the blog posts, and the blogger’s updates to the socials.
We can go a small step further and integrate into our reader/blogging tool a client for the socials. We’re already reading RSS feeds, why not also read the social newsfeeds?
Openvibe is a client that combines different socials and allows the user to also subscribe to RSS feeds within the same interface. This would be the corollary. And if we’re reading, and we have the ability to write blog posts from there in addition to comments, why not also be able to publish to the socials? I like the way Openvibe manages cross-posting: you can choose where you want to cross-post each time; when you mention somebody, a little dialog open so that you can mention them on the different socials you’re posting to â or just enter text if they aren’t everywhere.
I could start composing something to share to the socials, and partway through decide it should be a blog post: I’d select the blog as a destination (this would be somewhat similar to converting a comment I’ve started writing to a blog post, as described earlier), the interface would adapt, the cross-posting to the socials would become a “blog post share” in the background. This allows me to dynamically adapt where I’m going to post what I’m writing, as I’m writing it.
Having a reading interface with RSS feeds and the social newsfeeds together (with filters, obviously) replicates what actually happens on the socials when people share their blog posts (or even have an account for their blog) on the socials. This is more elegant, because it’s the actual subscription to the actual blog content, and doesn’t depend on the blogger making their content available through the socials.
Loose ends: comments elsewhere, web interface, modular
At this point we’ve got something that is really nicely integrated, but one thing is missing: comments made on other blogs. I dwelled on this a bit in part 1: this is one of the issues that coComment or Disqus tried to solve.
If the comment is made through the blogging-reading tool, it’s quite easy to capture (content and permalink, even title to the blog post it’s on). The only question would be how to display these comments (if desired, of course). In the sidebar (“my comments elsewhere”)? Collected in round-up posts like what comes from the socials (“my comments on other blogs this week”)? People will want different things, but it should be part of the package to make this possible.
What about comments made directly on other blogs? In an ideal world, the receiving blog would “notify” (webmention?) the commenter’s blog of the comment just made. But there would also have to be a way for the commenter to “secure” their comment, in case the blog in question doesn’t have the notification feature. I guess there are ways to do that with bookmarklets, browser extensions, or the like. Or why not by “sharing” the page one commented upon to the blogging-reading tool, with a way to indicate “there’s a comment of mine on this page”?
Throughout this post I’ve spoken about this integrated “tool” (or maybe app at times). As I see it, it should definitely have a web interface, like my WordPress blog has. Or Discourse. And be something that can be self-hosted, or managed. Apps are nice, but I think it’s clear today that tools or services should be available both through a “website” and an app.
It may seem like I’m describing “one more app/tool to rule them all”, but in my mind it’s not like that. I’m describing a set of principles. Just like we have various tools which allow blogging or reading RSS today, or various clients for Mastodon, this should not be a lock-in for a particular tool. Those with better understanding than me of ActivityPub, RSS, APIs and the like are most welcome to elaborate on how various protocols or frameworks could work together or be extended to make this kind of thing possible.
As I see it, with an agreement of how these different general features function, we could even go towards more modular tools, where I could use a WordPress base for blogging, which would be compatible with something derived from Openvibe for the socials integration, and have the choice between a future iteration of FeedLand or WordPress Reader or NetNewsWire for the reading part â and they would all integrate seamlessly in such a manner that I will not feel like I am using multiple tools, but one. There could even be add-ons/plugins (I heard this idea in this OTM interview of Jay Graber) to manage how you filter your RSS+socials timeline (algorithm? no algorithm? labelling?), how you mashup your socials of the day into pretty blogs posts â or not, etc.
I have the intuitive hope that something approaching my present pipe dream can be built around WordPress â particularly after hearing Dave Winer invite us to think differently about WordPress. I’m curious to see if what he’s cooking us with WordLand brings us in the kind of direction I’m thinking about. And of course, if you know of anything that makes what I’m talking about here reality, comment away!
PPS everyone: I didn’t proofread and I feel my writing is more clunky than usual today, sorry â brain still recovering. Point out the typos and broken sentences and I’ll go and fix them!
PPPS: might do a part 4 on privacy, and need to cover non-text content better, in addition to going into more detail regarding “Today on the socials” posts, so chances are there will be more in this series, at some point…
Some thoughts (part 1 of 3) following exchanges on Bluesky with Dave, amongst others. My Facebook exile is clearly bringing to a boil my preoccupation with our reliance on big capitalist platforms for our online presence and social life. Though I never “stopped blogging”, I clearly poured a lot more energy over the last decade into what I now think of as “The Socials” (Twitter, Facebook, Bluesky, Mastodon and the like).
I am pondering a lot on what I am “missing”, having lost facebook. On what is “difficult” about blogging, in comparison. Where is the friction?
Very clearly, one thing that The Socials (I’ll drop the uppercase soon) do very well is:
bring everything (reading, writing, responding) together in one seamless interface/site/app
shift interaction closer to real-time and what we perceive as “conversation”.
The rest of this blog post covers the first point. A second one will cover the second one. And finally, in a third post I’ll try and put together a proposal for how we can use our understanding of how the socials manage “so well” to remove friction from blogging and help reboot the blogosphere.
As I was writing this post I poked around in my archives to link to where I’d spoken about some aspects of the topic, so here are a some of those I dug up, in addition to those linked in the text itself (realising I wrote so much about this stuff it makes my head hurt):
I see three main “activities” for taking part in the text-based social web, and a fourth that may be worth distinguishing from the third:
Reading or consuming: basically, taking in things that others have put there.
Responding, commenting, reacting: expressing oneself based on something somebody else has provided.
Writing: making available to others ideas, stories, in a broad sense, our creations.
Sharing or boosting: highlighting for our network/readership things that are not by us.
Some comments regarding this typology (bear with me, it will come together in the end).
Reading
RSS does a good job of allowing us to collect things to read from different sources into one place. Many different tools make RSS feeds available. Many different tools read/collect/organise RSS feeds. However, they usually keep this collection of feeds private.
As Dave says, subscribing to an RSS feed generally requires too many steps. Too much friction. The socials make it 1-click (sometimes two) to follow or friend (connect to) somebody. And it’s right there in front of you, a button that calls you to do it. Inside blogging platforms like WordPress.com or Tumblr, you have some kind of 1-click subscription, but it keeps you in their internal reader (just like the socials do, by the way).
Commenting
Responding/commenting is a can of worms, in my opinion. When I started blogging, blogs had no comments. We responded to each other’s publications by writing on our own blogs and linking to what we were responding or reacting to. I actually wrote about this a couple of days back.
second, the way comments are designed invite shorter contributions or reactions â this makes the exchange more conversational and less epistolary, tightening the relationship between the different parts of the exchange provided by different people and quickening the pace
comments link back to the commenter’s blog, therefore creating an incentive to comment for visibility and not just for what one has to say
the visibility incentive leads to people commenting while adding little value (in the best cases) and outright spam (in the worst, widespread case)
the lack of a frictionless system to be informed of responses to comments (think “response notifications” on the socials) leads to interrupted interactions (I liked the term “drive-by commenting“)
the widespread presence of comments on blogs raises the bar for what is perceived as “deserving” to be a blog post, possibly contributing to the idea that writing a blog post is a “big thing” that you might need to make time for (or that might suck up half your day), in comparison with just “leaving a quick comment” after reading something
the visibility of comments led to it becoming a measure of blogging success, increasing a kind of competitiveness in the space, and, in some cases, even its commercialisation.
I see comments as solving two main problems:
attaching the “discussion” about a publication to that publication: all in one place, instead of spread out in blog posts you might not even know exist
lowering the barrier to entry for participating in said discussion: you don’t need any sort of account to comment.
Over the years, many tools have attempted, in some way, to “fix” the problems that come with comments. A few examples:
In a world without comments, people who read a post will not necessarily know there is a “response” somewhere else out there in the blogosphere. The blog author might see it if the person responding tells them (some way or another), or if they check their referrers (didn’t we all use to do that). But the reader cannot know, unless the blog post author knows, and links to the response. Trackback and Pingback came in to solve this issue, creating a kind of automated comment on the destination post when somebody linked to it (with all the spam and abuse issues one can imagine).
Tags and Technorati also played a role in “assembling” blog posts around a specific topic, which could be seen as some kind of loose conversation.
But it’s not the same thing as having the different contributions to a conversation one below the other on the screen at the same time.
Writing
This one is simple. There are many good tools (many open-source) to write blog posts. You can create an account somewhere and get started, or install software on a server somewhere â with a hosting company or in your basement. They work on mobile, in the desktop browser, or even in apps. There are generally ways to export your content and move to another tool if you want. Some are full of bells and whistles, others are pared down.
Blogging has no character limit â the socials do. This, implicitly, encourages writing different things. Design also does that: is the box I’m writing in something that takes up the whole page (like the one I’m typing this blog post in) or is it a little box that might expand a bit but not that much, like on Facebook (which also doesn’t have character limits)?
I think this is a crucial aspect which should not be ignored. The blog posts I wrote in 2000-2001 are, for many of them, things that would be updates on the socials today. They are not the same as blog posts, and we need to keep that. The way we interact with “updates” or “blog posts” is also different (I’ll come to that below if you’re still reading by then). They generate a different kind of interaction. And sometimes, we start writing an update (or even a comment/reply) and it transforms into something that could be a blog post. How do we accommodate for that?
Sharing
Sharing is trickier, and this is why I’ve separated from writing. If writing can be thinking out loud or telling a story I have in my head, sharing is “I saw something and you should see it too”. Maybe I want to add an explanation to why I’m sharing it, or “comment” (hah!), but maybe I just want to put it out there, nearly like a shared bookmark. Of course, if what I write about what I’m sharing starts taking up a lot of space, I’m probably going to be writing a blog post with a link in it. And if I’m just sharing a link to something, I might as well be using some kind of public bookmarking tool (remember delicious?)
Bringing it all together
This is what I said the socials were great at. When I’m on Facebook, I am on my news feed (reading). I can 1-click-share and 1-click-comment on what I see, in addition to 1-click-subscribe if something new I want to track crosses my radar. If I want to write something, the box to do so is in the same view as my news feed â or pretty much any “reading” page I’ll be looking at (a group, for example; groups are another thing to talk about, but that’ll be another post).
I don’t really have to determine if I want to read, write, share, comment â I go to the same place. Whatever I want to do, the tool and environment remains the same. Tumblr does that well too.
Whereas look at blogging:
I want to write a post, I go to my blogging software
I want to read stuff, I open my RSS reader (confession: I’ve never been good at this) or conjure up a blog URL from somewhere (memory? bookmark? blogroll? link in another post?)
I’m done reading something (in my RSS reader) and want to comment: I need to click over to the blog itself to do that â or wait, do I want to comment, or write a whole blog post? I have no clue how much I’m going to want to write once I get going, I just know I have something to say.
I read a great blog post (or other thing online, for that matter) and want to share it, I need to pick up the link and write a blog post. Or maybe, instead, I just stick the link in a toot on Mastodon? There are “blog this” bookmarklets, but what about if I’m on my phone?
Yeah, I could post my “statusy updates” to my blog like it’s summer 2000, but do my blog subscribers really want to see “spent a lot of time feeding the sick old cat” in their RSS reader?
Think about community platforms like Discourse: want to post, want to respond, want to read? All in the same “place”. You get notifications, you can configure them. I think there is a lot to learn from this type of platform and the socials to bring “blogging stuff” together.
And before somebody says: “your blog should replace your socials” or “you should just blog on mastodon”, wait for the post I plan on writing tomorrow about what I see as a very important distinction in between these two types of online “social” spaces: exchange intensity and pace.
Vous savez, hein, que vos Google Docs et Google Sheets, les vrais, ceux en “format Google”, quand vous synchronisez Google Drive sur votre ordi, ils ne sont pas vraiment sur votre ordi, mĂȘme si vous les voyez?
Vous voyez la liste, lĂ , sur mon ordi. Ce ne sont pas des fichiers. Ce ne sont que des raccourcis. Sauvegarder ça (car vous avez tous un systĂšme de sauvegarde en route, n’est-ce pas, Time Machin sur Mac, ou autre chose sur Windows, que sais-je) ça ne sauvegarde rien. Les PDF ce sont de vrais fichiers sur votre ordi, oui. Mais pas les Google Docs, Google Sheets, et consorts. Pour vraiment sauvegarder vos documents Google, il faut faire un takeout, et lĂ on vous donne du Word, du Excel, du PDF, du RTF ou du CSV.
[en] The cottage industry of cheap WordPress websites is leaving in its wake a huge number of small business owners who do not have the technical skill or know-how to maintain their installations: do updates, fix problems, avoid getting hacked — hell, deal with being hacked. This article explains how we came to this and … Continue reading “SOS WordPress: je suis lĂ pour vous! [fr]“
[en]
The cottage industry of cheap WordPress websites is leaving in its wake a huge number of small business owners who do not have the technical skill or know-how to maintain their installations: do updates, fix problems, avoid getting hacked -- hell, deal with being hacked. This article explains how we came to this and where I fit in (tl;dr I help people figure out how to fix their site or problems).
Bon. Alors ma question Ă vous, lecteurs. Comment est-ce que je condense cette tartine en quelque chose de “vendable”, ou du moins “communicable”? Qu’est-ce qui Ă votre avis “parle” le plus Ă ceux qui auraient besoin de mon aide?
[en] Spent a lot of time fixing various server and device annoyances. Thanks to everyone who helped me for one thing or another! Everything seems to be running fine now, except for MySQL on the web server which continues to choke pretty regularly. Lesson learned in all these adventures: sometimes a clean reinstall is a better strategy than lengthy troubleshooting.
Etape suivante, donc, du coup, avant de faire l’apprenti-sorciĂšre, c’est de voir ce que raconte l’utilitaire mysqltuner. Je vous ferai un rapport si je trouve ce que c’est!
Wait– A blogging platform? Isn’t WordPress enough? Well… to be honest, it’s too much. Don’t get me wrong, I love WordPress. Chances are I’m going to continue using it. But WordPress is much more than a blogging tool. By now, it’s become a full-blown CMS you can build all sorts of sites with.
For somebody who just wants a simple blog… It’s a little bit overkill. I think it’s good that there is a little “competition”, and I also think that starting from scratch once in a while is not a bad idea.
So, I’ve installed my copy of Ghost on my mac and played with it a bit. It’s very bare-bones right now and a little geeky — for example, is a blogging platform with no visual editor really viable? — but I think it looks very promising and I’m looking forward to the hosted version being open to the public.
The plugin has been around since early 2005, and honestly, what it does hasn’t really changed: it allows you to specify a summary of your post in another language and label it as such, as you can see here on Climb to the Stars. If you want more complex handling of languages in WordPress, head over to WPML, the likes of which weren’t around when I first threw a few functions together to try and make my bilingual blogging life easier.
So, what’s new?
unlike me, Claude actually knows how to write code, so instead of being some horribly outdated collection of clumsy functions, the plugin’s code is now upto 2013 standards (hadn’t seen an update in 4 years, can you imagine?)
it’s now possible to have more than two languages in your blog, with two “different language” excerpts accompanying your main post
you can now choose the markup for your excerpts without having to wade through plugin code: there is a lovely settings page for that and other things you can configure
the language widget in the page editing screen is a drop-down now, and not an ugly text field where you need to type your language’s code
you can also filter excerpts based on your readers’ browser settings
…and the plugin has been tested with the latest version of WordPress! (not that it broke too much before…)
So thanks so much Claude, it feels good to have Basic Bilingual off life support and alive again!
If you use Basic Bilingual I’d really love if you could take a few minutes to write a review over on wordpress.org. Thanks! Oh, and if you have a crazy plugin idea that needs bringing to life, ping Claude about it đ
Quand on fait un lien vers un article, attention de bien prendre l’adresse de l’article (en cliquant sur le titre) et non simplement l’adresse du blog ou de la page d’accueil du site.
Ne cochez jamais la case “ouvrir le lien dans une nouvelle fenĂȘtre” — target="_blank" c’est trĂšs bien pour les applications web comme Twitter et Facebook, mais vraiment pas top pour un blog ou un site web.
![Can I Write a Quick Blog Post? [en]](https://i0.wp.com/climbtothestars.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2025/11/img_4823.jpg?fit=1200%2C678&ssl=1)
![Blogging After 8PM [en]](https://i0.wp.com/climbtothestars.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2025/11/87810c6b-f2f7-467e-b742-3ee84e9c7f82.jpg?fit=1200%2C881&ssl=1)
![Rebooting The Blogosphere (Part 3: Integration) [en]](https://i0.wp.com/climbtothestars.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2025/09/img_3878.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1)
![Rebooting The Blogosphere (Part 1: Activities) [en]](https://i0.wp.com/climbtothestars.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2025/09/img_3156.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1)
![Vrac du jour [en]](https://i0.wp.com/climbtothestars.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2025/08/Screenshot-2025-08-26-at-14.17.34.png?fit=1200%2C1176&ssl=1)
