Blogger Relations: What is it About? [en]

[fr] Les relations blogueurs: qu'est-ce que c'est, et en quoi est-ce différent des relations presse/publiques? (Je pense qu'il va falloir faire un article là-dessus en français à l'occasion.)

I thought I’d write a post to quickly explain what I view as a particular field in social media: blogger relations. I prefer to view blogger relations as a speciality of community management rather than a speciality in PR, because it has much more to do with human relationships and communities (sometimes very small) than with managing a public image.

Blogger relations is what I call the work I’ve been doing for Web 2.0 Expo Europe, Le Web in Paris, and now Solar Impulse.

Companies and organizations are starting (well, they have been “starting” for the last five years, so some of you might get the feeling this start is dragging along) to realize that there is a population out there in social media that produces content, is very connected, and sometimes pretty influential. I single out bloggers and podcasters because despite all the excitement around Twitter and Facebook, publications in those mediums are too transient. Three weeks later, the tweets and status updates are long gone (Storify might yet change that, so I’ll be keeping a close eye on that service).

Though some online publications are very close in organisation and tone to traditional media, most bloggers and podcasters out there are better not treated as “press”. And they have value to bring that justifies treating them slightly differently from the general public.

Bloggers and podcasters are similar to press in the sense that they produce content. But they are also similar to the general public in the sense that they show interest for something by passion and often in their free time, and not based on the agenda of their employer.

As I see it, blogger relations imply a more “balanced” and “open” relationship between the parties, where it’s possible to lay things clearly on the table. Offer and demand are in my opinion more present in defining the power balance than when dealing with the press. Are bloggers desperate to attend your event or follow your project? You can be selective, and put conditions. Are bloggers and podcasters not yet aware of what you’re doing? You might want to bring slightly more to the table to make it worth the investment for them.

All this, of course, requires one to know what is and is not acceptable in the blogger world. Ask for a blog post, or to display a badge on one’s blog? Should be pretty much OK. Try to exercise editorial control? Not so good.

Maybe some of the above is valid with the press, too. But again, I’d like to stress a big difference between bloggers/podcasters and press: in general, the blogger or podcaster will be coming to you on his free time and of his own accord, whether the journalist will often be sent by his employer or client, on his work time. This changes things.

I like to define two types of situations in blogger relations: floodgates and outreach. The strategy for both of these is quite different: in one case you need to filter through a large number of incoming requests. In the other, you need to reach out to those you want to interest.

I’m planning to blog more on this topic (I’ve wanted to for a long time), but for now I just wanted to lay down some general thoughts.

Do Not Use Your Brand Name to Sign Comments [en]

Never use your brand name to sign comments. You are a person, not a brand.

How do you want to be perceived?

As a person?

Or as “advertising-disguised-as-conversation”?

There’s nothing wrong with representing a brand. You can even sign “Judy Smith (MyGreatBrand)” if it’s important to you — but be aware that it will make you sound like a commentor-for-hire or a “community manager” (note the quotes and the lowercase, not to be confused with the Community Manager, reserved for people who “get it” and usually occupy a senior position).

Signing with your brand name is also the surest way of being identified as spam — whether you really are spam or not.

You don’t want to make things difficult for the blogger who is deciding whether to approve or trash your comment: identify yourself clearly as a human being. Whether you use a name or a stable, recognizable nickname is not a big issue (at least for me). But using your brand as your nickname is so… cheesy.

And also impolite. You know who I am. Your comment is an open door to a conversation. Why would I not be allowed to know who you are? Even the robots who answer the phone in the worst of customer service call centres tell you their name.

Don’t be a ghost, hiding under the big white sheet of your brand.

Please do not sign comments with your brand name. Be a human being. Give me a name.

I’m toying the idea of replacing brand names with something witty (“Insert Brand Name Here”, or preferably something better I’ll think of under the shower tomorrow morning) and making them link to this article when people try signing comments with them. What do you think?

Ye Olde-School Personal Blogs Are Still Around [en]

[fr] Le blog personnel existe toujours. On a parfois tendance à l'oublier, noyés que l'on est sous la masse des machines à audience que l'on appelle "blog" ces jours.

Yesterday evening I was winding down when I thought of checking a bunch of old-school (personal) blogs I visit once in a while. If you’re not an old hand, and you’re looking for some good personal blogs written by those who made up the blogosphere in its golden hour, read on:

There are of course tons of other great blogs out there. But most of these were around in my early days of blogging, and it warms my heart that they still are.

What are your favorite personal blogs?

Blogging Feast and Famine [en]

[fr] Je n'ai jamais pu me résoudre à planifier la publication de mes articles, ici. Sitôt écrit, sitôt publié -- tu parles de gratification immédiate. Ces temps, je me demande si je devrais peut-être changer ça.

One thing I’ve never managed to bring myself to do is schedule my blogposts here on CTTS. I do it for other blogs I’m involved in professionally, but I find that once I’ve written something I simply do not have the patience to wait for it to see the light of day. Slave of immediate gratification am I indeed.

Does it bother you when you get nothing to read for days or weeks, and then a flood of blogposts over the space of a week or maybe even a day? Should I be a little less writer-centred and a little more reader-centred?

It’s something I’m wondering about these days.

Quick LeWeb'10 News, and IceRocket [en]

[fr] LeWeb'10? C'est le dernier moment pour demander une accréditation blogueur officiel (lisez un peu la littérature avant de le faire, cependant, pour être au fait de nos attentes). Inscrivez-vous à la blogger boat party organisée par Frédéric et Damien, regardez le programme (en ligne aux yeux de tous), taguez vos articles "leweb10" et pinguez IceRocket. Pour les détails, lire la version anglaise de cet article!

So, what’s up with LeWeb’10?

You have until Friday to send in your application if you would like us to consider you for official blogger accreditation. A little recommended background reading before you apply, though: the kind of profile we look for in official bloggers, what bloggers do at conferences, live-blogging vs. live-tweeting (and why we prefer the former), the guidelines introducting the application form. (If you applied before yesterday, your application has already been processed and you have been sent an e-mail — in any case. Check your spam folder if you haven’t heard from us.)

Frédéric and Damien are (like last year!) organizing a cool Blogger Party (on a boat!) for official bloggers and others. Number of attendees is limited to keep the party cozy, so don’t delay signing up for it if you want to be able to come.

LeWeb’10 programme is out! The first thing I noticed when reading through the programme is that we’ll be hearing Bertrand Piccard, that I coincidentally blogged about the other day on the Ebookers.ch travel blog. I’ve heard him speak in French, and he’s a great speaker — look forward to hearing from him again. There are of course many other exciting speakers, but he’s the one that jumped out at me.

You might remember that last month, I was musing on tags and the demise of Technorati. Today, I caught myself thinking what a shame it was that there wasn’t one central place where all bloggers present at LeWeb’10 (official or otherwise) could see their posts aggregated during the conference. Well, actually, there is one: IceRocket. So, tag your posts with “leweb10” and ping IceRocket, and we’ll start building a nice collection of posts on the leweb10 tag page. Official blogger posts will be aggregated on the conference site itself in addition to that.

Now I just need to figure out why IceRocket isn’t indexing my blog.

Le blog et le blogazine [fr]

[en] I write a weekly column for Les Quotidiennes, which I republish here on CTTS for safekeeping.

Chroniques du monde connecté: cet article a été initialement publié dans Les Quotidiennes (voir l’original).

J’ai pris une grave décision aujourd’hui: je vais arrêter d’appeler “blog” les publications qui sont en fait des “blogazines” (magazines en ligne construits sur un outil de blog).

Ce matin, on me demandait sur ONE FM d’expliquer ce qu’est un blog (oui, c’est encore utile en 2010). Un blog, c’est un format de publication. Des articles, empilés les uns sur les autres. Les plus récents en haut de la page, les plus anciens en bas de la page (et les encore plus anciens, bien rangés dans les archives).

Il y a un truc important dans cette “définition” qui semble être gentiment en train de passer à la trappe: “la page”.

Je vais le dire clairement: dès aujourd’hui, pour que j’appelle une publication en ligne un blog, je dois voir quelque part une page qui me permet de voir les x ou y derniers articles publiés, quelle que soit leur catégorie.

Par exemple, ce site est certainement un sympathique blogazine, mais ce n’est pas un blog (non, le lien vers le dernier article ça ne compte pas).

Quand j’arrive sur un site, je n’ai pas envie de devoir faire le tour de toutes les rubriques (notez en passant le vocabulaire “presse papier”) pour lire les cinq derniers articles. C’était d’ailleurs tout l’intérêt du format blog, vous savez: on débarque, on voit tout de suite ce qui est frais (ou que ce n’est pas frais).

Donc, et je me répète, je serai désormais intransigeante dans ma distinction entre les blogs et les blogazines. Parce qu’à force de confondre les deux, on commence à raconter n’importe quoi sur les blogs (oui, je provoque).

Zemanta's Related Articles: Very Mixed Feelings [en]

Image representing Zemanta as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

For years now, I’ve been seeing my articles pop up on other blogs under Zemanta‘s related links. And for years, it has bothered me.

Actually, it’s a bit more subtle than that: it does not bother me at all that people list my articles under related links on their posts. It’s flattering. It’s linkage. I like it.

What bothers me is two things:

  1. the trackback “spam” that often accompanies such links
  2. the fact search engines do not differentiate between “real” in-content links and related links.

Somewhere in the middle of the first sentence of this article, I decided that if I was going to complain about Zemanta (though it’s not only “complain”, you’ll see — I said mixed feelings), I should at least install it and try it out. Being the old-school blogger I am, I hadn’t gone down that road yet, believe it or not.

To be honest, Zemanta is a blogger’s wet dream. No more hunting for that Facebook logo or an image to illustrate your post. No wonder most Big Blogs nowadays always have a picture handy! Zemanta crawls all over the place, comes back with a bag full of images, and lets you select the one you want. Ditto for links to services or brand names you mention. And ditto for other articles with related content that you might want to send your readers to check out.

Using Zemanta is not automatic, as they told me a few months ago when I complained to them about what I think of as the trackback spam issue. And indeed, as a blogger, I have to click on the Zemanta elements I want to include in my post.

So where is the problem?

The problem, for me, is that it does not mean the same thing if somebody actually takes the trouble to read my article, writes it into his post in context, or simply dumps it with a bunch of links at the end of his post because it had a nice title or sounded vaguely related to what he was writing about.

It cheapens the value of the link.

That semi-automatic link involves little or no effort, little or no research, no real endorsement. I’m ready to bet that most of the Zemanta related links bloggers put at the end of their posts are there because they look good, rather than because the blogger once read the article, remembered it, hunted it down again (or bookmarked it), and decided to link to it while writing.

With that in mind, sending trackbacks to these related articles is exactly the practice I frown upon in my recent post about Technorati, Tags, and Trackbacks. And in all honesty, I wouldn’t mind if they were systematically nofollow, or at least if blog search engines like IceRocket or Google Blog search learned to make the difference between in-content links and end-of-post semi-automatically-generated link dumps. (See my IceRocket search for CTTS and the Google Blog search one — and check out how many of those links come from Zemanta rather than human beings.)

Why am I so brutal about these related links?

I have no problem with the idea of listing related links to a blog post. I have no problem with automatic lists of related posts — I even use them here on Climb to the Stars. But c’mon, if we’re putting nofollow on comment author site links, we should also be putting nofollow on related links. Specially as I see, now I have installed Zemanta, how easy and noncommittal it is to include these related links.

Zemanta related articles preview

Look at this screenshot: I see a list of blog post titles related to what I’m writing. I can hover on one and see a text snippet, click on “read more” to quickly check it out (am I going to do anything more than “quickly check it out” if I’m writing a blog post and impatient to hit Publish?), and then simply click on the post title to add it to the end of my content under “related links”. Easy. Too easy! These links are not content-driven — unless you consider their presence in the Zemanta “related articles” is content-driven by Zemanta’s algorithm. But their choice is not driven by the fact the blogger values their content.

One thing I was told by Zemanta (IIRC) was that bloggers could choose to add nofollow to their related links. Actually, they can choose to add nofollow to all their Zemanta links. All-or-nothing. And honestly, the way it’s phrased, who would want to select that option?

Your Zemanta Preferences

(No way I’m going to tell Zemanta to mark all the links it creates for me as “objectionable”. No way.)

So, what are my thoughts now?

  • I like the idea of Zemanta as a content-enhancement support tool, I don’t want to trash it
  • it seems specially useful for images as far as I’m concerned (though I’m disappointed it didn’t pick up the two screenshots above from my stream when I uploaded them — had to add them manually)
  • I like my blog showing up in related links elsewhere, though I don’t give that much value to it, and I really don’t see it as a valuable source of traffic (my stats tell me that)
  • search engines and blog tools should make a distinction between “manual” links and automatic/semi-automatic links, particularly of the “related” kind
  • I don’t want to get trackbacks when somebody includes my blog in their related links: maybe Zemanta could provide a way for blog owners to record that preference? would there be a way for Zemanta to tell blog tools like WordPress “don’t send trackbacks or pingbacks for this or that link?”
  • the nofollow setting in Zemanta needs to be a little more subtle than all-or-nothing, and do away with the scary wording (“objectionable”, c’mon on)
  • and while we’re at it, is there a WordPress plugin which would allow me to “un-nofollow” links left on my blog by certain commenters? the honest-to-good human beings who do not spend their time trying to link-drop?

Note: in this post, I used Zemanta to link to… itself (in the first paragraph), add the logo top right, and that’s it. I’m going to keep it active for the few next posts though to see if I actually use it, other than just liking the idea.

Twitter Killed My Blog and Comments Killed Our Links [en]

I hope the provocative title grabbed your attention.

Let me say it straight out: my blog is not dead, neither are our links.

But I still have a point.

Twitter is IRC on steroids, for those of you who have already experienced the irresistable draw of a chatroom full of smart witty people, 24/7. Twitter is my very own IRC channel, where I do not have to hear those I do not care about. It’s less geeky than IRC, which means that many of my “online spaces” collide there.

It’s intoxicating. I love it. I can spend all day there.

But that’s not why I would provocatively say that it has killed my blog. Twitter is a content-sharing space, not just a super IRC channel. Found an interesting link? Five years ago, it would have morphed into a blog post, because that was pretty much the only way to share it. Nowadays, dump it in Twitter. Arrived safely at destination? Again, 5 years ago, blog post. Now, tweet.

New tools have an impact on how we use old tools. Sometimes we abandon them altogether, but most of the time, we just redefine the way we use them. This is what I was trying to explore in the first panel I ever moderated, at BlogTalk 2008 (crappy video).

So, no, Twitter did not kill my blog, but take a group of bloggers and give them Twitter accounts, and the temperature of the blogosphere changes. All the high-speed stuff moves to Twitter.

If you just look at the present, it’s no big deal. People are still connecting. That’s what all this social media/software is about, right? Connecting people. Online. But the problem with us spending all our time swimming in the real-time stream is that it’s just that, a real-time stream. Not much is left of it once it has passed.

Take this short piece about translation I wrote nearly 10 years ago. It’s not a masterpiece, but it’s still there, as readable as it was when I wrote it. Had this taken place on Twitter, nothing much would be left of it. Gone with the wind, if I dare say.

Many many years ago when I first started blogging (can you tell I’m on a nostalgic streak?), blogs did not have comments. Hell, I barely even had permalinks when I started. Permalinks were the key, though: they allowed bloggers to link to each other’s writings.

And we did. Conversations would bounce from blog to blog. They weren’t chatty like on IM, IRC, or Twitter. They were blog-post-speed conversations. We would have to think (a little) before we wrote.

Even though comments are a wonderful invention and I would never want to take them back, they did ruin this, in a way. People started leaving comments all over the place and didn’t come back to their blogs to write about the conversations they were participating in. It’s one of the reasons I was so excited about coComment when it came out, or services like BackType (which also seems to have backed out of tracking comments one makes) or Disqus. (Aside: see, I’d love somebody to hire me to do some research and write a memo on the current state of the comment-tracking-sphere and all the players involved. I could totally see myself doing that.)

With comments came less of an incentive to link to each other on our blogs. With Twitter (and Facebook), less of an incentive to share certain things on our blogs, and also, less of an incentive to comment, as it became much easier to just “tweet a quickie” to the post author (therefore making our activity visible to all our followers). And with the death of Technorati tags (I’ll call it that), we bloggers are now connecting to each other on other social networks than the blogosphere.

I think it’s time to actively reclaim the blogosphere as our own, after leaving it for too long at the hands of marketing and PR.

Bloggers, it’s time to wake up! Write blog posts. Link to your fellow bloggers. Leave comments on their posts, or better, respond to them on your blogs.

We don’t have to abandon Twitter and Facebook — just remember that first and foremost, we are writers, and that “conversation” (though ’tis a wonderful thing) is not writing.

Don't You Tire of Real-Time? [en]

[fr] Tout ce temps réel sur le web me fatigue. On néglige les expressions plus profondes que permet le web, sur nos blogs par exemple.

I find that I’m increasingly tired with real-time. Keeping up with the stream. Living on the cutting-edge. I like diving into deeper explorations that require me to step out of the real-time stream of tweets and statuses and IRC and IM conversations.

I like reading and writing.

I’ve never been much of a “news” person — and I know that my little self and my little blog have no chance of competing with the Techcrunches and ReadWriteWebs and GigaOms that seem to be all over the place now.

Life is real-time enough. I like spending time on the web like in a book.

I still love Twitter and Facebook and Tumblr and all the transient stuff that’s floating around — but sometimes I feel like I let myself get lost in it.

Once again, I’m back here, on my blog.