Month: February 2006

Tracking Keywords: PubSub and Technorati [en]

[fr] Comparaison de PubSub et Technorati pour surveiller des mots-clés dans la blogosphère. Aucun des deux vraiment satisfaisant.

One thing I came back with from LIFT’06 is that what one should monitor is more keyword watchlists, rather than blogs. I used to have a few hundred blogs in an aggregator, but gave up using it ages ago. Too much to sift through, considering it isn’t my day job to do so.

During his talk, Robert mentioned that he used PubSub to track keywords like “Microsoft” or his name. Of course, it makes sense. Tracking topics that are of interest to you. I created a PubSub account and set up a few subscriptions to try to track things like mentions of my hometown, Lausanne, teenagers and weblogs, and of course my name. Tracking your name makes a lot of sense if you’re looking out for conversations. Think of highlighting in IRC: if everybody tracks their name in blogs, then you can just call out to them. Hi, Robert, by the way!

Now, this name thing. I guess tracking your surname with PubSub is all right if you’re named Scoble, but if you’re named Booth it makes things much trickier. I added my first name, but that didn’t help much if I omitted the quotes. And as people are likely to refer to me as “Stephanie Booth”, “Stéphanie Booth”, “Steph Booth” or even “Stéph Booth” that’s a bunch to track, but let’s say it’s manageable. But it rules out people who refer to me as “bunny” or even “Tara” (yeah, and if I start tracking those too, it’s not going to make things less messy).

What I really liked about PubSub is that it offers me an out-of-the-box sidebar for firefox. I can get a list of the recent posts containing my keywords in there, browse them, click, check, move on. It has highlighting too, and that’s really nice — helps me see straight away if the Stephanie Booth on the page is me or some homonym. (For some reason it’s not working anymore, but it was nice while it lasted.)

What I didn’t like is that it didn’t seem to be returning as many results as Technorati. Also, I wasn’t always sure if it was responding or not (I guess the current conversation around my name isn’t very busy ;-)). And the “Latest Messages” option only gave me the last three posts in each subscription. It gave me the impression of being a little incomplete in the results it returned. I suspect it isn’t really incomplete, but I can’t really nail what gives me the impression. In any case, PubSub and Technorati give different results for a search on “cocomment”

The slight unsatisfaction with PubSub made me go back to Technorati watchlists, which I had never really used. I like the idea of tracking URLs in posts. If somebody links to me, then it doesn’t matter if the person called me “Stéph Booth” or “Tara” or “la Mère Denis“, I’ll see it. I can also track links to my Flickr account and other blogs and stuff easily. Keyword searches work too. So, neat, I now have a watchlist page on Technorati with all my monitoring material. I can subscribe to each of them by RSS.

Gripes, however. And for the sake of it, let’s assume I’m hoping my watchlists will replace my NewsReader, and not go and live in it:

  • I can only expand one watchlist at a time.
  • Expanding a watchlist shows only the three last results.
  • I don’t have a compilation page with the latest results from all/any of my watchlists.
  • I’d like a sidebar!
  • Blogroll links keep showing up in Technorati search results. It’s nice to know you’ve been blogrolled, but you don’t need to be reminded of it each time you do a search.
  • No highlighting!

What it boils down to: I’d like a Technorati Watchlist sidebar for FireFox and highlighting of search terms or URL in the pages which are loaded from it.

Do you monitor keywords, URLs or search terms? Do you use PubSub or Technorati? Do you stick the results in your feed reader to keep track of them?

Update: of course, I’m much more familiar with Technorati, so there might be something about PubSub I’m missing completely. Feel free to educate me.

How Will CoComment Change Our Commenting Habits? [en]

I was really excited to be able to talk about coComment yesterday Saturday night, and I really think it’s a great service, but I never thought it would pick up as fast as it did. As I heard Robert saying at LIFT, the blogosphere is not about how many people read you, but about who does, and how things scale and can get out of hand once the masses get hold of them.

CoComment is already changing the way I participate in comments (conversations!) on other blogs. I feel more connected. I feel like it makes more sense to leave a comment on a blog I scarcely visit, because it’s not a message in a bottle anymore: I have an easy way to get back to it. CoComment makes my activity on other blogs visible, so it encourages me to be active (yeah, that’s how I am! I like the spotlights, didn’t they tell you?) and maybe more conversational.

On the other hand, this is what I see coming: more popularity for popular blogs or posts or commenters (coComment will amplify the feedback loop effect for comments). Easy celeb’ stalking. Maybe more self-consciousness about “where I comment” and “what I comment”? Comments by top commenters will have a different weight on your blog, and different consequences, because they’ll get a different visibility. A-lister X’s comment on a lowly blog may have gone unnoticed until now, but if they use coComment, it won’t anymore. Will we start signing out of coComment to retain privacy over a certain amounts of comments we make, and that we don’t want in the public eye?

I’m really happy to see coComment gaining so much popularity. I’m just a bit worried. Is this too much success/visibility to soon? I’ve seen people (gently) bitching around already about what a shame it was that coComment did not support all blog platforms, or that it only tracked comments by coCommenters. Laurent says he’s pushing to open it up on Monday night, but I wonder: is it really a good idea? What are the risks involved? What has the most potential for damage: frustrating people because they can’t yet be “part of it”, or not being able to manage the scaling, user feedback, and user expectations for a public service?

I know I’m a worry-bug, and Laurent and Nicolas are smart and know the insides of the service much better than I do — so I’ll just go and prepare my stuff for school and worry about useful things for my life just now (like, what am I going to teach this morning). All the same, guys: “Soyez prudents!”

Lift: Thanks for the Videos, but… [en]

[fr] Problème pour visionner les vidéos de LIFT avec OSX et Firefox. Et vous?

I tried to get to the LIFT videos but I can’t read them. I have the latest versions of Tiger and Firefox. I spent a minute in a pop-up configuration window (that was nasty to start with), and then it just didn’t work. Can’t we have DailyMotion-style videos that “simply work”?

Audio works, though. Would be nice to be able to download it instead of stream.

As for the podcast feed, it asks me if I want to open NNWL. A little button to subscribe in iTunes would be really neat.

Visibility is in Feedback Loops [en]

[fr] Ce qui est populaire le reste, et devient plus populaire encore, justement parce que c'est populaire. De temps en temps un pic de visibilité se présente à  nous (comme le montre l'illustration ci-dessous). Est-ce que ceux qui sont les plus connus le sont simplement parce qu'ils proposent un menu qui convient à  la majorité, et qu'ils savent tirer avantage de ces pics pour rester la tête hors de l'eau? Est-ce vrai? Est-ce bien? Est-ce mal? Qu'en dites-vous?

Last month, I had a jump in my Cheese Sandwich stats:

Traffic peak graph.

This was because the post Get an iBook! had for some reason or another made it to the “Fastest growing weblogs” list which appears in every WordPress.com dashboard. And it stayed stuck there. I think there was a bug or something and it got stuck there, but it might also have been a little feedback loop: what is popular becomes more popular because it is popular — I’ve discussed this briefly regarding a photograph of mine which suddenly became ‘interesting’ in Flickr.

So, let’s first note one thing: this little peak of traffic finally had no long-term effects for me. My traffic is back down to what it was before. Sometimes a feedback loop can send you into another playground, but most times it doesn’t. So either you try to create another popularity burst, or you just keep plodding along your way.

My second thought is that popularity, visibility, fame, or whatever-you’ll-call-it mainly has to do with feedback loops. If something is very visible, you’re more likely to know about it. Sounds stupid, doesn’t it? I think I’m coming to accept it’s a rule of the game. But to stay in the limelight once the feedback loop has put you there, you need certain qualities. Which ones? Look at the latest interesting photos on Flickr. What do they have in common?

I think you can have a great mind, great style, great many things, and still stay in the shadow if the right feedback loop doesn’t come along. Is being successful just a case of managing feedback loops and getting them to work for you? Is this bad?

I know nothing about feedback loops, actually, so what I’m saying here might very well be a lot of BS. I’ll let you decide. I’m feeling very conversational after LIFT.

CoComment enfin public [fr]

[en] Now that the cat is out of the hat and that coComments has been scobleized, I have to say I'm really very happy to have been a small part of it by putting Nicolas and Laurent in touch. You're going to love this service! All the French here is the story of coComment in the very early beginning, before the beginning of things...

C’était le 14 septembre dernier. Je recevais un e-mail de la part d’un de mes lecteurs, Nicolas Dengler. Il m’écrivait parce qu’il n’arrivait pas à  accéder à  un article que je liais depuis mon site. En passant, il me faisait part de son désir de me rencontrer pour blablater d’un projet ou deux qu’il mijotait et au sujet desquels il désirait avoir mon avis. A garder confidentiel, bien entendu.

Le samedi suivant, j’arrive avec près d’une demi-heure de retard à  notre rendez-vous au Café Luna (j’étais pas en avance pour commencer, puis j’ai attendu au faux bistrot, puis je n’arrivais pas à  le joindre sur son mobile) et on a bien failli ne pas se reconnaître. Si ma mémoire est bonne, Nicolas était quasi sorti du bistrot quand il est revenu, par acquis de conscience, voir si je n’étais pas celle avec qui il avait rendez-vous. Tout ça pour dire qu’on a passé à  un cheveu de se rater magistralement.

On a bu un thé, on a causé, de tout, de rien, de blogs, et des idées qu’avait Nicolas. Une en particulier me branchait bien: elle avait quelque chose à  voir avec étendre la logique du commentaire (de la conversation autour du contenu d’un site web) à  tout le web — pas seulement les blogs. Ça m’a rappelé une fonctionnalité qu’offrait à  un moment ICQ: on pouvait chatter avec les personnes qui étaient sur la même page web que nous, ou quelque chose comme ça. Bref, ce que me racontait Nicolas paraissait fort intéressant. Nous sommes restés en contact par e-mail (enfin surtout Nicolas, parce que je faisais une vilaine rechute de TMS et je n’étais pas très causante par clavier interposé).

Environ deux semaines plus tard, j’étais à  Genève et j’en profitais pour boire un thé (je suis une buveuse de thé) avec Laurent. On a causé, de tout, de rien, de la vie, de ce qu’il faisait.

Un jour plus tard ou même pas, Nicolas me demande si je ne connaîtrais pas par hasard une boîte fournissant un certain service (un peu à  la Technorati mais plus ciblé) que recherche son employeur, qui est en train de commencer à  s’intéresser aux blogs. Laurent m’avait justement parlé de quelque chose comme ça, je le dis à  Nicolas, ils prennent contact. La suite vous sera mieux racontée par les acteurs principaux, parce qu’à  partir de là , ils se sont mis à  la tâche (on saute quelques épisodes, je vous en fais grâce) pour donner vie à  coComment.

J’ai fait une apparition à  une des premières sessions brainstorming (et honnêtement, je n’ai pas eu l’impression d’être d’une grande utilité!) et ça avait l’air prometteur. J’ai été propulsée bêta-testeuse dès la mise en service de la première version (toute secrète), mais malheureusement tout ça tombait assez mal pour moi et je n’ai pas été super active. Je peux vous assurer que je vais me rattraper!

J’avoue que c’est très excitant pour moi de voir ce qui est en train de se passer maintenant: le projet est à  présent en bêta fermé (donc un nombre limité d’utilisateurs sont en train de le tester), il fonctionne, Robert Scoble en parle sur son blog et supplie Laurent de lui donner un code d’accès, bref, ça va décoller à  fond, j’en suis certaine. Je suis super heureuse pour Nicolas et Laurent (il y a d’autres protagonistes mais je ne les connais pas) que le bébé reçoive un tel accueil. Ravie aussi d’en faire un peu partie, et très excitée de voir ce qui va se passer une fois la phase de test terminée.

Mais bon… C’est quoi, coComment? Jérôme vous explique tout ça très bien.

Précision: quand je dis “public”, c’est dans le sens qu’on peut maintenant en parler. Ce n’est bien entendu pas encore “public” dans le sens qu’il faut un code d’accès pour faire partie des testeurs. (Merci à  Marc-Olivier d’avoir relevé l’ambiguïté.) J’ai quelques invitations si vous vous sentez l’âme d’un bêta-testeur motivé!

Wild Videocast of Robert Scoble Interview [en]

[fr] Une interview (partielle) de Robert Scoble par Marc-Olivier et David de IC Agency, filmée de façon un peu sauvage. Quand on dit que les blogs sont la télé-réalité du web...

I was having a post-LIFT chat with Marc-Olivier in the lounge yesterday when David came up, stole him from me and started talking about getting Robert to do a podcast with them for a blog they were going to open. I offered to introduce them to him.

I was going to take a couple of photographs but as they started, I decided for video instead. Think of it as a “making of” videocast of their podcast. (I say “wild” not because Robert went wild on the video but because it wasn’t planned, staged, or whatever. Vidéocasting sauvage would be how I’d put it in French.

5-minute videocast with Robert (partial)

Robert Scoble podcast (5 mins) by Steph

My initial intention was to upload it straight away. I like the immediateness you can get with the web. (If moblogging wasn’t so bloody expensive I’d be moblogging away…) David actually asked me to hold off publishing the video and cut out some bits of it or put their audio on it, because they wanted to edit some of the audio (English mistakes in the questions, but IMHO, who cares?) I said I preferred to publish what I had recorded “as is”, mistakes, goofs, and all — it was OK with Robert.

I’m a bit embarrassed by the situation, to be honest. My video is on DailyMotion under a CC-by-sa-nc license, so they can put their audio on top if they like, whatever. I don’t really like having to refrain from publishing something, but on the other hand I am very much aware that if you appear on a video or a photograph, you have a right to control publication of it. I think what bothered me was the argument of “exclusivity”. My videocast is only about a third of the interview, anyway.

What would you have done? Should I have refrained from posting this until they had their version up?

I will of course be posting the link to their version(s) here as soon as I get it.

Back to Being a Low-Tech Audience [en]

[fr] Dans une conférence où beaucoup de blogueurs sont présents, on a besoin de pauses-blogging 😉 -- et peut-être aussi de présentations qui tiennent bien dans un billet? Suivent quelques suggestions pour les personnes qui font des conférences -- sachant que je ne fais certainement pas tout ce que je dis.

Running a bit late for Emmanuelle‘s talk on anonymity online, I decided to go in without my laptop, which was in the other room. Decision also fueled by my earlier cogitations about my decreasing attention span.

Well, there we are: I was more attentive and took notes on paper.

I was telling Robert that conferences like this lacked blogging breaks. The audience is in the real-time information business if you have lots of bloggers in the room, so if you don’t want them to spend half the talk time uploading photos, chatting, and writing up blog posts. So, how about give us blogging breaks, and plan post-sized talks? Wouldn’t that be neat?

For many people, the most interesting moments of a gathering like this is around and outside the talks. Try to change the balance a bit? I know there are organisational imperatives, but I’m sure a solution could be found.

Other than that, some ideas for speakers (and I’m aware I don’t do what I preach when I’m giving a talk):

  • Give me an outline of the talk, paper would be best (I’ll get lost somewhere else by trying to find it online). If I tune out of your talk for a minute (and I’m bound to) I need a chance to tune back in. An outline will help with that.
  • Be theatrical, keep me listening, or make me participate. Effective use of slides is good, but I don’t know how to do it so I won’t give you any advice on the topic.
  • Don’t talk to fast, particularly when the audio in the venue isn’t too good. Articulate. (Yeah. Sorry.)

Update: I took hand-written notes of Robert’s talk too. Lesson learnt.

My Notes of Robert Scoble's Talk

Now let’s see if you can decypher my handwriting!

LIFT'06 Photographs [en]

[fr] Les photos de LIFT'06 aujourd'hui sont en train d'être mises en ligne à  vitesse tout petit v. Merci de votre patience.

You probably noticed I’ve been uploading LIFT’06 photographs to Flickr since yesterday. I took a whole bunch of really fun photos last night, but upload is slow as slug, so I don’t know when they’ll be up. Thanks for your patience!

Cosy Geeking
Robert and Anina geeking away

Almost all of my photos are CC-licensed. Feel free to use them on your blogs if you’re speaking about the conference — a mugshot or two does tend to liven-up text-only conference notes.

Bloggy Friday ce soir avec la LIFT'06-fête [fr]

[en] Bloggy Friday: join us at the LIFT'06 Closing Party!

Pour être dernière minute, c’est dernière minute, mais vous le saviez déjà : le Bloggy Friday a lieu ce soir à  Genève, et l’idée serait qu’on se retrouve lors de “l’after” de LIFT’06. Lieu communiqué dès que je serai au courant plus tard dans la matinée. Dans le pire des cas, il suffit de venir trainer devant le CICG dès la fin de la conférence.

Mise à  jour: 9h30 à  l’Ethno Bar, 1 rue Bovy-Lysberg.

Tonight!

Mise à  jour 04.02.06

Un gros pardon pour le lapin posé aux blogueurs romands qui se seraient pointés hier soir. Les Romands de LIFT sont gentiment rentrés chez eux les uns après les autres (c’était deux journées super crevantes). J’ai quant à  moi tenu bon jusqu’au moment où j’ai réalisé que j’avais de nouveau oublié d’échanger mon ticket de parking, et que j’allais me retrouver avec une facture salée.

Devant ma fatigue, la perspective du week-end qui m’attendait, et le trou qui s’annonçait dans mon compte en banque, j’ai préféré rentrer. (J’ai eu de la chance, un ange muni d’un ticket de parking a croisé ma route, ça s’est donc pas si mal fini que ça.)

Donc, si vous vous êtes pointés à  l’Ethno Bar et que vous n’y avez pas vu de têtes familières, désolée. J’espère que vous aurez quand même saisi l’occasion de faire connaissance des geeks internationaux présents!

LIFT'06 Notes [en]

[fr] Mes notes (brouillon) de la journée à  LIFT'06.

Here are my draughty notes, as is, pretty incomplete and not necessarily intelligible. Use if you wish.