Tag: commenting

Against Threaded Conversations on Blogs [en]

[fr] J'avoue une préférence marquée pour les conversations linéaires plutôt que hierarchiques (en arbre). Les conversations linéaires génèrent peut-être moins de commentaires, mais elles ont un rapport signal/bruit plus favorable, n'encourageant pas le hors-sujet. Elles sont plus faciles à suivre et me semblent plus adaptées aux blogs.

So, now that Going Solo Lausanne is behind me and I can come back to a slightly more sane pace of life (and blogging here, hopefully), I’m starting to read blogs again, a little. Don’t hold your breath too long though, contrary to popular belief, I’ve never been much of a blog-reader.

Blog commenting

One topic I’ve read about a bit, and which is of particular interest for me, is blog commenting. Aside from the fascinating topic (I’m not kidding) of blog comment ownership, which I touched upon myself more than 18 months ago, there is the age-old debate: threaded vs. non-threaded comments.

On the backdrop of my break-up with coComment (impending, in the process, fresh) and their post about commenter’s rights, I’ve taken a closer look at Disqus. It looks promising, it does some stuff I like, but also stuff I really don’t like, like the dreaded threaded comments.

So, here’s an attempt to try to explain why I think that threaded comments in a blog context are not necessarily a good thing — although popular wisdom would have that they are “better” than normal, flat, conversations.

I did a little research to see if I could find anything solid to back up my claims (if anyone knows of proper research on these issues, let me know), but I didn’t find anything really solid. So, I’ll just have to try to make this logical enough that it can be convincing.

The appeal of threaded conversations

Threaded conversations are as old as the internet itself. Usenet, e-mail discussion list archives. So, they’re nothing new, and have been around a while.

When blogs started including comments — oh yes, there were blogs way before there were comments, and the commenting script I used on this blog was for many years a popular destination — so, when blog started including comments, those comments were not threaded (in the sense that they allowed hierarchy in the comments, or branching off, or a tree-like view).

For many years, all I saw on blogs was linear conversations, as opposed to threaded, tree-like conversations. Most forum software also functions like that.

Then, of course, with some regularity, I’ve heard people asking for plugins to make the conversations on their blogs “threaded”. And I wondered. Why the attraction to hierarchical conversations?

When we have a conversation, be it with a single other person, or around a big table, it flows in one direction: the direction of time. There is before, and there is after. One might say “you said something 10 minutes ago that I’d like to answer” — and we’re quite capable of following this kind of conversation. We do it every day.

If we chat, be it on IRC or on IM, or any other kind of chatroom, we know that there are often multiple intertwined conversations going on at the same time. With a bit of practice, it doesn’t bother us too much. But the important point remains: the conversation is ordered chronologically.

So, be it offline or online, most of the conversations we have are time-ordered.

I think the appeal of threaded hierarchical conversations lies in the fact that they seem more “orderly” than one long stream of posts, ordered not necessarily by the logic of the conversation topic, but by the flow of time in which it takes place. It’s hierarchical. It’s organized. It’s neat, mathematical, logical. Algorithmic. Computer-friendly.

But is it brain-friendly?

Human-friendly conversations

Human beings do not think like computers. Though some human beings who spend lots of time programming or give excessive importance to logico-mathematical thinking might like approaching problems and the rest of life in a binary way, that is simply not how most people function. (Literary backdrop for this paragraph: A Perfect Mess.)

I think people who like threaded conversations like them because they have a higher order of organisation than non-threaded conversations. And better organised should be… better.

You won’t be surprised that I disagree with this. A good conversation online, for me, is one that can be easily followed, caught up with, and participated in. In that respect, a linear suite of comments is much easier to read or catch up with than a huge tree. When it comes to participating, the linear conversation offers only one option: add a comment at the end. In the tree, you first have to decide where in the tree you’re going to post. (Literary backdrop for this paragraph: The Paradox of Choice.)

How the format impacts the conversation

Another way to tackle this is to examine what impact hierarchical and linear comment threads have on the conversations they host.

Hierarchical – Threaded:

  • off-topic comments branch off into separate conversations
  • overall, more comments
  • lots of parallel conversations

Linear:

  • conversation stays reasonably focused
  • less comments
  • limited number of parallel conversations

I personally do not think that “more comments = better”. On a blog post, I like to see the conversation stay reasonably focused on the initial topic. For that reason, I think that linear comments are best on a blog.

More conversation is not always better

Of course, there are always parallel conversations going on. On Twitter, on FriendFeed, in IM windows I’ll never know about. As a blogger, I would like a way to point to these conversations from my post, so that a person reading could then have access easily to all the public conversations going on about what they read. Conversation fragmentation is not something we’re going to get rid of, but we can try to minimize it.

Increasingly, our problem is becoming one of signal-to-noise ratio and chatter. These are subjective notions. My signal is somebody else’s noise, and vice versa. I’m happy that there is chatter and small talk in the world and online (it’s a big part of human interaction and what relationships can be made of), also about what I write. But on my blog, I’d like to keep the chatter somewhat down, even if that means my “number of comments per post” or “conversational index” is not high. I’d rather have less conversation here, and give it a chance to be more interesting and accessible to outsiders, than huge 50+ comment threads that nobody is going to read besides the hardcore die-hard social media types.

More reading and listening

You’ll find some of the links I found on del.icio.us. If you’re into videos, the topic was raised about 6 months ago on Seesmic. Here’s what I had to say at the time:

I’ve also dug up a few quotes I found in some old discussions on MeFi. They’re in my Tumblr, but as Tumblr tumbles along, I’m reproducing them here:

If you’re trying to build community, it is clear that linear, non-threaded discussions are superior. There is a good body of research on this – it’s not new, it’s not a novel idea. For tech support stuff, hierarchical tree structures are better, in general.

Micheal Boyle (mikel)

One of the arguments for adding any feature that is designed to hide noise is that it gives it a permanent home. When Slashdot added moderation and auto-hiding to their threads, they gave the -1 NATALIE PORTMAN’S BOOBS brigade a permanent home on the site.

I checked out digg’s new setup earlier this week and 75% of all the comments were complaining about mod points. I don’t know if that’s an improvement.

Matt Haughey

This place is like a pub.

One does not have threaded conversations in a pub.

five fresh fish

More on coComment Advertising [en]

[fr] Malheureusement, coComment et moi sommes partis pour une "Séparation 2.0: quand les 'social tools' que vous aimiez ne vous le rendent pas." Le choix de leur distributeur de publicité est vraiment malheureux (un cran au-dessus du spam, à mon sens), et clairement, il n'y a pas de dialogue entre coComment et ses utilisateurs, malgré les déclarations acharnées "d'ouverture au dialogue".

A la recherche d'une solution de remplacement pour la saisie des commentaires, donc. Le suivi des conversations m'intéresse beaucoup moins que la centralisation de tous mes commentaires en un endroit.

I was alerted to this a few days ago by Nathalie, and after witnessing it with my own eyes — well, I’m going to go to bed a little later to blog about it, after all.

After preparing to slap ads in our comment RSS feeds, coComment is staying on the same ugly and obviously slippery slope by inserting ads in the cocobar:

coComment blog ads in cocobar

So, slightly more discreet than the big banners placed in the RSS feed, but not in very good taste either. Here are some examples of scrolling ad text:

  • “Want fast fitness results? Click for free info, revolutionary products.”
  • “Walk on the well placed warmth of radiant heating. Click now!”
  • “Free comparison of top car rental companies. Click here!”
  • “Click to create your dream holiday trip now.”
  • “Easy-to-use, advanced features, flexible phone systems. Click for more info.”
  • “Visa, MasterCard, AMEX & Discover. Compare Offers & Apply Online. Click here!”

Reloading a cocobar-enabled page will provide you with hours of endless entertainment. (I’m kidding — but there are more out there, of course.)

Now, I understand that coComment needs to “monetize”, though one could question a business model which seems to be based on revenue from scrolling ads and blinking banners. (I can’t remember who said “if your business model is putting ads in your service, think again”.)

There are ads and ads, though. Here’s a sample of banners from the coComment site:

coComment blog » Blog Archive » Advertising, Revenues and harsh realities

Commenting is sexy. HotForWords is the talk of the party at Geek Goes Chic

Commenting is sexy. HotForWords is the talk of the party at Geek Goes Chic

coComment blog ads

The screen captures don’t render the blinking quality of most of these ads, but I guess your imagination can fill in. Now, does anybody else than me feel that this kind of advert is just about one step above spam? Based on a few of the comments I can read on the post Matt wrote about the “harsh realities” of advertising, it seems not:

With all honesty, the banners displayed on the cocomment site are awful and are making the service look VERY unprofessional – totally agree with “disappointed” on this one. Few will argue that perception is 99% of reality, so with those banner ads making the site look like crap, the whole service becomes questionable. I felt like I was about to get a trojan into my computer when I first saw www.cocomment.com

there are other advertising partners that don’t crap up your web site with ads that flash in your face. most opensource projects are using google ad sens now (just an example) that displays relevant ads that look very subtle.

stan

I agree with some of the commenters here about the ad selection. It wouldn’t be so bad if it were unobtrusive AdWords or… something a little classier. It cheapens your brand. Think upscale! Or, at least, more upscale.

Allan White, in comment

Yes, there are ads and ads. These ones definitely make coComment look very cheap and dodgy, and I’m not sure it would encourage users to hand over credit card details to pay for an ad-free version. Also, what’s with the Hot For Words thing? I’m sorry, but this is not my world. coComment has obviously moved into a space which is very alien to my beloved blogosphere.

Unfortunately, it’s not enough to state that you want to have a conversation to actually be having one (I guess that for starters, that last post would have pointed to the post of mine that contributed to prompt it). A conversation starts with listening and caring, and obviously, despite their efforts to prove the contrary, the coComment team sadly don’t get this.

What could they have done? Well, I’m not going to launch into a session of full-blown strategic consulting for an ex-client of mine (who didn’t seem to value my advice much at the time), but simple things like taking up issues such as the arrival of advertising with the people who use the service before actually dumping ads in their feeds unannounced could be a way of showing you care a little bit about how they feel. Understanding that apologies and justifications when you mess up do not erase the past also seems like a good idea. As my friend Brian Solis put it:

Making mistakes in social media is a lot like sticking daggers into a wooden fence. Just because you apologize and pull them out, they still leave the scars for others to see, and feel. Sometime apologies help people feel better, but they don’t fix perception. This is why thinking before engaging is critical to success in the world social media marketing. This is after all, about people.

Brian Solis

So, as I told Brian, coComment and I are headed for Breakup 2.0: when the social media tools you loved don’t love you back (yes, you can quote that one, it’s from me).

At the moment, I’m only using the service to “save” the comments I make, because I like keeping a trace of my writings (I used to collect stamps). Sadly, I’m not even sure coComment will allow me to walk out with all my data in an XML dump — I don’t see anything obvious in the interface for that, so if I am able to, it will probably be due to my relationships with the people who have access to the server. (I said “if”.)

The tracking feature is too confusing and overloaded for me to use — I can imagine using something like co.mments to keep an eye on the small number of conversations where I’m on the lookout for an answer. But I don’t have an alternate solution for “capturing” the comments I make. Copy-paste is a bit of a bore, and del.icio.us doesn’t capture the comment content — just the fact that there is a comment.

I’ve been thinking up an idea involving a Firefox add-on. It would have a bunch of algorithms to detect comments fields (maybe would support some microformat allowing to identify comment feeds or forms), have a simple on/off toggle to “activate” the field for capture (some right-click thing, much more practical than a bookmarklet or a browser button, because it’s always there, handy, wherever you click), would colour the field in something really visible when capture is on (red! pink! green!) without disrupting readability (I need to see what I type). It would capture the comment, permalink, blog post name (it knows I’m the commenter, I could fill in that info in the add-on settings), and dump the info in an XML or RSS file, or in the database of my WordPress installation, with the help of a WordPress plugin.

It’s a half-baked idea, of course, and I don’t have the JS skills to actually code anything like this. It should probably be a week-end project for somebody with sufficient Javascript-fu — if you’re interested in bringing it to life, get in touch.

Ouvrir ou non les commentaires? [en]

A midi, un ami m’apprenait qu’il avait un blog déjà depuis un petit moment, mais qu’il n’avait pas osé ouvrir les commentaires (c’est-à-dire: permettre aux lecteurs de s’exprimer directement sur son site, en réaction à ses articles) de peur de se faire déborder ou d’y passer trop de temps.

Souvent, lorsque je commence à “parler blogs” avec des clients (ou futurs clients), c’est autour des commentaires que tout se crispe. On a peur de ce qu’autrui pourrait venir écrire “chez nous”, et on se retrouve aux prises avec ce bon vieux pote qui nous joue pourtant de bien sales tours: le contrôle.

Si vous avez lu Naked Conversations (fortement recommandé pour qui voudrait comprendre l’importance que les blogs prennent dans le monde économique et social d’aujourd’hui) ou bien The Cluetrain Manifesto (le “manifeste” est traduit en français mais franchement, il m’a passé complètement par-dessus la tête plusieurs fois avant que j’attaque le livre — que je dévore en ce moment — disponible gratuitement sur le site), si vous avez donc lu un de ces deux livres, vous saurez de quoi je parle. On ne peut plus contrôler.

Sur internet, chacun peut en deux minutes, gratuitement et sans compétences techniques particulières, créer un blog (filez chez WordPress.com si vous êtes tenté) et y écrire ce qu’il souhaite. Tôt ou tard, si ce qu’il écrit présente un intérêt pour suffisamment de personnes (et ce nombre n’a pas besoin d’être bien grand), il se trouvera un public.

Le rapport avec les commentaires? Si vous avez peur de ce qu’on pourrait dire de vous ou répondre à vos écrits, ne pas avoir de commentaires ne change rien. Si vous avez des choses peu honorables à cacher, si vous êtes malhonnête, si vous refusez de dialoguer avec autrui, alors certainement, internet est un grand méchant espace effrayant, et si vous y avez un site, vous allez éviter d’encourager les gens à s’y exprimer. Oui. Laisser à ses lecteurs la possibilité de s’exprimer chez vous, via des commentaires, c’est inviter au dialogue — et bien des personnes qui s’expriment dans les commentaires ne l’auraient pas fait s’il leur avait fallu prendre la peine d’envoyer un e-mail ou d’ouvrir leur propre blog. Mais de l’autre côté, fermer les commentaires n’empêchera jamais quiconque de déverser du fiel à votre sujet en ligne — que ce fiel soit justifié ou non n’est ici pas la question.

Admettons cependant que la plupart des gens (et des entreprises) sont (raisonnablement) honnêtes et n’ont pas trop de vilains cadavres pourrissant au fond de leurs placards. (Il y en a toujours quelques-uns, de squelettes ou de cadavres, mais on finira par comprendre que les vrais êtres humains ont parfois des boutons d’acné sur le nez et qu’ils ne sont pas retouchés en permanence sous PhotoShop.) Donc, pourquoi cette peur des commentaires, si au fond on est relativement comfortable avec qui l’on est et ce qu’on fait? Quelques hypothèses:

  1. Les gens peuvent dire n’importe quoi! C’est vrai. Ils peuvent aussi dire n’importe quoi ailleurs. Sur votre site, l’avantage c’est que vous pouvez immédiatement répondre au commentaire en question pour corriger le tir. Pensez-y: dans la “vraie vie” (arghl, je déteste utiliser cette expression) on agit pareil. Quand quelqu’un dit quelque chose de stupide ou de faux à notre sujet, eh bien, on répond. On discute. (La conversation, vous vous souvenez?) De plus, notons que la plupart des gens ne passent pas leur temps à aller laisser des commentaires débiles sur les blogs des autres. Pas dans le monde des adultes civilisés, et sur un blog qui a l’air “sérieux”, en tous cas.

  2. Ça va prendre du temps! Là, il vaut la peine de s’arrêter une minute et de se demander ce qui va prendre tellement de temps. Déjà, réaliser que les craintes du point 1. se réalisent peu souvent. Ensuite, savoir que la plupart du temps, le problème d’un blog n’est pas qu’il y a trop de commentaires, mais pas assez. Sur Climb to the Stars, avec environ 2000-2500 lecteurs par jour (ça varie, mais voilà l’ordre de grandeur), j’ai entre trois et cinq commentaires par jour en moyenne. Parfois zéro. Combien de lecteurs a votre blog? Ce qui peut prendre du temps, c’est de nettoyer le spam, si l’outil de blog que l’on utilise n’a pas un bon filtre. Mais ça, ce n’est pas une question de principe, c’est une question de choix de moteur de blog (et aussi pour ça qu’en général je recommande WordPress — le filtre à spam fourni avec, Akismet, est assez efficace).

  3. Les gens pourraient poser des questions difficiles, ou dire des choses incomfortables… Ça, honnêtement, je pense que c’est la seule crainte réelle à avoir. Si la conversation n’est certes pas impossible sans commentaires (on avait des conversations via nos blogs avant que ceux-ci ne comprennent cette fonctionnalité), ceux-ci invitent clairement au dialogue. Et le dialogue, cela implique une certaine ouverture à l’autre — d’assumer une certaine humanité. On ne peut pas dialoguer si l’on parle comme un communiqué de presse ou des prospectus de marketing. Oui, il y des choses qui sont imparfaites. Oui, on fait des erreurs. Non, on ne sait pas tout. Oui, la concurrence peut être bien aussi. Il vaut donc la peine de se demander si on est prêt pour ça — sachant que dans le fond, ce n’est pas si difficile que ça (discuter, c’est quelque chose que l’on fait tous les jours, sans y prêter vraiment attention), et qu’en fin de compte, l’évolution d’internet nous permet de moins en moins d’échapper à ce dialogue…

Moralité: ouvrez les commentaires, ne les filtrez pas, gardez un oeil attentif dessus au début si vous êtes inquiet, résolvez les problèmes posés par les commentaires “difficiles” en y répondant plutôt qu’en censurant… et si vraiment vous considérez que vous êtes débordé de commentaires, activez la modération, voire supprimez-les. Mais dans cet ordre. Essayez d’abord. Faites marche arrière ensuite si nécessaire (et je vous parie que dans 99% des cas, cela ne le sera pas).

Promote Comments Plugin Idea [en]

[fr] Une idée de plugin que m'a soufflée Bruno Giussani: pouvoir "promouvoir" un commentaire et l'intégrer sans peine au contenu du billet.

A few days before LIFT’07, I had dinner with Bruno Giussani, who now happens to be one of the lucky people to live in beautiful Lausanne.

Amongst other things, he told of his frustrations with current blogging software (he’s using TypePad) and how the perfect tool didn’t seem to exist. I guess one simple reason this is so is that “perfect” means different things to different people.

I use WordPress, like it, and generally recommend it around me, because to my mind it’s the most complete and user-friendly platform out there, and because the plugin architecture allows for nearly any functionality to be added to it if somebody takes the trouble to code it.

Bruno shared with me one shortcoming of today’s blogging technology that he and Robert Scoble were talking about at LIFT last year (so this is not a “new” idea). Here is a write-up of this idea (with his permission of course), with a few implementation and interface details, in the hope that someone out there will pick it up and write the plugin. (I’ve heard enough people recently asking for plugin ideas to work their mad coding skillz on…)

Here’s the basic idea: there are often valuable contributions in the comments of a post, and we would like a way to be able to effortlessly “promote” a comment (or part of it) into the body of a post. This allows the blogger to easily act as an editor for the conversations taking place on his blog.

All this, of course, would have to be nice and ajaxy. Here’s how I could imagine it happening.

First of all, the plugin recognises that the author of the post is logged in, and adds a “promote” link next to each comment, in addition to the “edit” link. If that link is clicked, the comment text is automagically appended to the post content in a blockquote, complete with author name and link to original comment.

If part of the comment is selected when the promote link/button is clicked, then only that excerpt is quoted in the post.

Instead of the dreaded confirmation pop-up, a nice confirmation message should appear alongside the promoted comment in the post body, with an undo link.

From a back-end perspective, the promote link “knows” which post it belongs to (check the ID of the comment <div> it’s in). It shouldn’t be very difficult to grab author name, author url, comment permalink, format them all nicely (blockquotes, credit, microformats), edit the post, and add it to the end of the content with some introductory text (like “promoted comment”) and an “edited” stamp with time/date of promotion.

Possible problems:

  • if part of a comment is selected and the wrong “promote” link is clicked, what behaviour would be expected? Probably an error message of some sort, or even better (but probably trickier to implement), a choice: promote the whole post (based on link clicked) or the excerpt (based on selection)?
  • should promoted comments really be added into the post content, or stored as post meta data?

Taking this a step futher: wouldn’t it be nice to let the blogger introduce the promoted comment, or write a few lines after it? In this case, pressing the promote button/link would bring up a pop-up where more text can be added, with the option of displaying it before or after the quoted text.

And even another step futher (but I’m not sure it’s an interesting one): how about allowing the blogger to make a new post out of the promoted comment, instead of just appending it to the current post? Would this be interesting?

Additional thoughts on this basic idea are welcome (Bruno, let me know if I forgot something, it’s been a while since our conversation). If you’re a plugin author and you feel upto it, go for it (just make sure you give Bruno credit for the idea). I’ll be happy to try it out.

Job Offer: Chief Architect, coComment [en]

[fr] On embauche chez coComment! Architecte en chef recherché.

I’ve dropped hints with a few people that there were exciting things to come within coComment. There is still much we cannot say, but here’s a fist tidbit (and not the least): we’re hiring.

We are looking for an individual with skills in product design, familiar with the blogging/commenting space from both a technical and user community perspective. Fluent in English and at least one other European language.

Your remit will be to work closely with the Marketing and Technology teams to formulate and lead the development of CoComment.

You will need to be flexbile, fast thinking, passionate about the blogging/commenting space and with the ability to take creative thought and turn it into deliverable product.

In return, CoComment offers a creative, supportive and fast-moving environment, the opportunity to join a rapidly growing company and equity incentives.

Please email matt at cocomment dot com with covering letter and CV, detailing current and expected remuneration.

As a personal note, I’d like to add that there are chances I’ll be reporting to the Chief Architect. It’s of course not yet 100% certain as there are many unknowns, but here I am, probably posting the ad for my future boss’s position…

Crossposted on coComment blog.

Le coComment nouveau est arrivé [fr]

[en] With the new coComment extension activated, browse to this article by 24heures. Click on the coComment logo once. Don't spill your coffee.

Je parlerai plus longuement de la nouvelle version de coComment qui vient d’être déployée (après l’annonce officielle, par exemple), mais je tenais à vous montrer ceci avant de filer à Paléo.

  1. Avec un navigateur FireFox (ou Flock! muni de la magnifique extension coComment, rendez-vous sur la page de l’article 24heures sur les blogs. *Edit: version archivée ici on dirait.
  2. Remarquez que le logo coComment en bas à droite devient orange. (Au lieu de bleu.)
  3. Cliquez sur le dit logo, une fois, avec le bouton de gauche.
  4. Lisez et extasiez-vous!

(Je n’en dit pas plus, il faut essayer. Oui, ça marche partout. Dingue.)

How Will CoComment Change Our Commenting Habits? [en]

I was really excited to be able to talk about coComment yesterday Saturday night, and I really think it’s a great service, but I never thought it would pick up as fast as it did. As I heard Robert saying at LIFT, the blogosphere is not about how many people read you, but about who does, and how things scale and can get out of hand once the masses get hold of them.

CoComment is already changing the way I participate in comments (conversations!) on other blogs. I feel more connected. I feel like it makes more sense to leave a comment on a blog I scarcely visit, because it’s not a message in a bottle anymore: I have an easy way to get back to it. CoComment makes my activity on other blogs visible, so it encourages me to be active (yeah, that’s how I am! I like the spotlights, didn’t they tell you?) and maybe more conversational.

On the other hand, this is what I see coming: more popularity for popular blogs or posts or commenters (coComment will amplify the feedback loop effect for comments). Easy celeb’ stalking. Maybe more self-consciousness about “where I comment” and “what I comment”? Comments by top commenters will have a different weight on your blog, and different consequences, because they’ll get a different visibility. A-lister X’s comment on a lowly blog may have gone unnoticed until now, but if they use coComment, it won’t anymore. Will we start signing out of coComment to retain privacy over a certain amounts of comments we make, and that we don’t want in the public eye?

I’m really happy to see coComment gaining so much popularity. I’m just a bit worried. Is this too much success/visibility to soon? I’ve seen people (gently) bitching around already about what a shame it was that coComment did not support all blog platforms, or that it only tracked comments by coCommenters. Laurent says he’s pushing to open it up on Monday night, but I wonder: is it really a good idea? What are the risks involved? What has the most potential for damage: frustrating people because they can’t yet be “part of it”, or not being able to manage the scaling, user feedback, and user expectations for a public service?

I know I’m a worry-bug, and Laurent and Nicolas are smart and know the insides of the service much better than I do — so I’ll just go and prepare my stuff for school and worry about useful things for my life just now (like, what am I going to teach this morning). All the same, guys: “Soyez prudents!”

CoComment enfin public [fr]

[en] Now that the cat is out of the hat and that coComments has been scobleized, I have to say I'm really very happy to have been a small part of it by putting Nicolas and Laurent in touch. You're going to love this service! All the French here is the story of coComment in the very early beginning, before the beginning of things...

C’était le 14 septembre dernier. Je recevais un e-mail de la part d’un de mes lecteurs, Nicolas Dengler. Il m’écrivait parce qu’il n’arrivait pas à  accéder à  un article que je liais depuis mon site. En passant, il me faisait part de son désir de me rencontrer pour blablater d’un projet ou deux qu’il mijotait et au sujet desquels il désirait avoir mon avis. A garder confidentiel, bien entendu.

Le samedi suivant, j’arrive avec près d’une demi-heure de retard à  notre rendez-vous au Café Luna (j’étais pas en avance pour commencer, puis j’ai attendu au faux bistrot, puis je n’arrivais pas à  le joindre sur son mobile) et on a bien failli ne pas se reconnaître. Si ma mémoire est bonne, Nicolas était quasi sorti du bistrot quand il est revenu, par acquis de conscience, voir si je n’étais pas celle avec qui il avait rendez-vous. Tout ça pour dire qu’on a passé à  un cheveu de se rater magistralement.

On a bu un thé, on a causé, de tout, de rien, de blogs, et des idées qu’avait Nicolas. Une en particulier me branchait bien: elle avait quelque chose à  voir avec étendre la logique du commentaire (de la conversation autour du contenu d’un site web) à  tout le web — pas seulement les blogs. Ça m’a rappelé une fonctionnalité qu’offrait à  un moment ICQ: on pouvait chatter avec les personnes qui étaient sur la même page web que nous, ou quelque chose comme ça. Bref, ce que me racontait Nicolas paraissait fort intéressant. Nous sommes restés en contact par e-mail (enfin surtout Nicolas, parce que je faisais une vilaine rechute de TMS et je n’étais pas très causante par clavier interposé).

Environ deux semaines plus tard, j’étais à  Genève et j’en profitais pour boire un thé (je suis une buveuse de thé) avec Laurent. On a causé, de tout, de rien, de la vie, de ce qu’il faisait.

Un jour plus tard ou même pas, Nicolas me demande si je ne connaîtrais pas par hasard une boîte fournissant un certain service (un peu à  la Technorati mais plus ciblé) que recherche son employeur, qui est en train de commencer à  s’intéresser aux blogs. Laurent m’avait justement parlé de quelque chose comme ça, je le dis à  Nicolas, ils prennent contact. La suite vous sera mieux racontée par les acteurs principaux, parce qu’à  partir de là , ils se sont mis à  la tâche (on saute quelques épisodes, je vous en fais grâce) pour donner vie à  coComment.

J’ai fait une apparition à  une des premières sessions brainstorming (et honnêtement, je n’ai pas eu l’impression d’être d’une grande utilité!) et ça avait l’air prometteur. J’ai été propulsée bêta-testeuse dès la mise en service de la première version (toute secrète), mais malheureusement tout ça tombait assez mal pour moi et je n’ai pas été super active. Je peux vous assurer que je vais me rattraper!

J’avoue que c’est très excitant pour moi de voir ce qui est en train de se passer maintenant: le projet est à  présent en bêta fermé (donc un nombre limité d’utilisateurs sont en train de le tester), il fonctionne, Robert Scoble en parle sur son blog et supplie Laurent de lui donner un code d’accès, bref, ça va décoller à  fond, j’en suis certaine. Je suis super heureuse pour Nicolas et Laurent (il y a d’autres protagonistes mais je ne les connais pas) que le bébé reçoive un tel accueil. Ravie aussi d’en faire un peu partie, et très excitée de voir ce qui va se passer une fois la phase de test terminée.

Mais bon… C’est quoi, coComment? Jérôme vous explique tout ça très bien.

Précision: quand je dis “public”, c’est dans le sens qu’on peut maintenant en parler. Ce n’est bien entendu pas encore “public” dans le sens qu’il faut un code d’accès pour faire partie des testeurs. (Merci à  Marc-Olivier d’avoir relevé l’ambiguïté.) J’ai quelques invitations si vous vous sentez l’âme d’un bêta-testeur motivé!