What’s wrong with retaliation?
Related posts:
Thoughts… [en]
BlogTalk 2008: Rejection [en]
Letting Go [en]
Real-Time is Burying History on the Web [en]
The Hearing Loss Spectrum, Between the Hearing World and Deaf Culture [en]
Twitter Metrics: Let's Remain Scientific, Please! [en]
Just because something is easy to measure doesn't mean it's important (Seth Godin) [en]
Lift10 Online Communities: The Transition from Broadcast to Multiplatform for a public service broadcaster: getting attention and measuring success (Alice Taylor) [en]
Lift10 Online Communities: YouTube’s Unfolding History (Jean Burgess) [en]
Routine and Freedom [en]
There’s a lot wrong with retaliation. Thanks for putting up this link!
Like many others have said, I do feel bad about WTC and it is sad that so
many people died. But thinking from a different angle, from one which
believes in cause and effect, there must have been a reason for the
attack. From their viewpoint, the hijackers had good reason to attack the
US in this way. From Bush’s viewpoint, they were wrong and it would only
be right for him to defend democracy. No one is right in this; but
personally, if more innocent people are killed then that is definitely
wrong.
There's a lot wrong with retaliation. Thanks for putting up this link!
Like many others have said, I do feel bad about WTC and it is sad that so
many people died. But thinking from a different angle, from one which
believes in cause and effect, there must have been a reason for the
attack. From their viewpoint, the hijackers had good reason to attack the
US in this way. From Bush's viewpoint, they were wrong and it would only
be right for him to defend democracy. No one is right in this; but
personally, if more innocent people are killed then that is definitely
wrong.