[fr]
Le texte et la vidéo sont fondamentalement différents. Je ne pense pas qu'il soit possible de "recréer" un dynamique comme celle de Twitter avec du contenu vidéo.
[en]
So, now that I’ve discovered what Loïc‘s startup, Seesmic, is about (thanks to Ben twittering his tests), here is my initial reaction to reading about it on Techcrunch.
I’m not certain a “video-based Twitter” is a viable concept: the huge difference between video and text is that the latter is scannable, and that’s precisely what allows the presence/flow dimension in Twitter. You can “keep an eye” on a stream of text, but can you “keep an eye” on a stream of videos? Also, it takes much less time to keep up with a stream of text than with a stream of videos.
Now, not to say that Seesmic is doomed (that would be a bit pretentious of me) — and I haven’t checked it out directly — but I do want to go on record saying that the dynamics created by Twitter and other flow/presence apps with text cannot simply be transferred to other media.
If it turns out I’m right, I’ll be able to say “I told you so” — and if I’m wrong, nobody will care.
Similar Posts:
- Trying the Seesmic Video Plugin
- An Experiment (Seesmic and The Black Swan)
- Seesmic Addiction
- Seesmic Tips
- Supernova Open Space: Presence
- How to Order Pizza in India: a Rant
- 20 nouvelles invitations pour Seesmic!
- Another Small Step With Google Buzz
- Flickr: Open Up Tagging Your Photos to the Community, Please
- Videos, Videos! And Kittens!






