The man seems pleasant, until I notice the earwax. I follow him off the train and clean his ear with my knife before I cut his throat. I can’t stand earwax. I go home and change; I’m late for work. Bob tells me off again. Pity his ears are clean.
Get my blog posts by e-mail
In this context, fear of toxicity strikes me as an old anxiety with a new name. Where the word filth once suggested, with its moralist air, the evils of the flesh, the word toxic now condemns the chemical evils of our industrial world. This is not to say that concerns over environmental pollution are not justified—like filth theory, toxicity theory is anchored in legitimate dangers—but that the way we think about toxicity bears some resemblance to the way we once thought about filth. Both theories allow their subscribers to maintain a sense of control over their own health by pursuing personal purity. For the filth theorist, this means a retreat into the home, where heavy curtains and shutters might seal out the smell of the poor and their problems. Our version of this shuttering is now achieved through the purchase of purified water, air purifiers, and food produced with the promise of purity.
Toxoid is the term for a toxin that has been rendered no longer toxic, but the existence of a class of vaccines called toxoids probably does not help quell widespread concerns that vaccination is a source of toxicity. The consumer advocate Barbara Loe Fisher routinely supports these fears, referring to vaccines as “biologicals of unknown toxicity” and calling for nontoxic preservatives and more studies on the “toxicity of all other vaccine additives” and their potential “cumulative toxic effects.” The toxicity she speaks of is elusive, shirting from the biological components of the vaccines to their preservatives, then to an issue of accumulation that implicates not just vaccines, but also toxicity from the environment at large.
As for mercury, a child will almost certainly get more mercury exposure from her immediate environment than from vaccination. This is true, too, of the aluminum that is often used as an adjuvant in vaccines to intensify the immune response. Aluminum is in a lot of things, including fruits and cereals as well as, again, breast milk. Our breast milk, it turns out, is as polluted as our environment at large. Laboratory analysis of breast milk has detected paint thinners, dry-cleaning fluids, flame retardants, pesticides, and rocket fuel. “Most of these chemicals are found in microscopic amounts,” the journalist Florence Williams notes, “but if human milk were sold at the local Piggly Wiggly, some stock would exceed federal food-safety levels for DDT residues and PCBs.”
The definition of toxin can be somewhat surprising if you have grown accustomed to hearing the word in the context of flame retardants and parabens. Though toxin is now often used to refer to man-made chemicals, the most precise meaning of the term is still reserved for biologically produced poisons. The pertussis toxin, for example, is responsible for damage to the lungs that can cause whooping cough to linger for months after the bacteria that produce it have been killed by antibiotics. The diphtheria toxin is a poison potent enough to cause massive organ failure, and tetanus produces a deadly neurotoxin. Vaccination now protects us against all these toxins.
“He was too pure,” a Baltimore mother said of her son, who developed leukemia as an infant. His mother blamed the pollutants in vaccines for his illness, and herself for allowing him to be vaccinated. Fears that formaldehyde from vaccines may cause cancer are similar to fears of mercury and aluminum, in that they coalesce around miniscule amounts of the substance in question, amounts considerably smaller than amounts from other common sources of exposure to the same substance. Formaldehyde is in automobile exhaust and cigarette smoke, as well as paper bags and paper towels, and it is released by gas stoves and open fireplaces. Many vaccines contain traces of the formaldehyde used to inactivate viruses, and this can be alarming to those of us who associate formaldehyde with dead frogs in glass jars. Large concentrations are indeed toxic, but formaldehyde is a product of our bodies, essential to our metabolism, and the amount of formaldehyde already circulating in our systems is considerably greater than the amount we receive through vaccination.
I already practiced some intuitive toxicology before my pregnancy, but I became thoroughly immersed in it after my son was born. As long as a child takes only breast milk, I discovered, one can enjoy the illusion of a closed system, a body that is not yet in dialogue with the impurities of farm and factory. Caught up in the romance of the untainted body, I remember feeling agony when my son drank water for the first time. “Unclean! Unclean!” my mind screamed.
The idea that “toxins,” rather than filth or germs, are the root cause of most maladies is a popular theory of disease among people like me. The toxins that concern us range from particle residue to high-fructose corn syrup, and particularly suspect substances include the bisphenol A lining our tin cans, the phthalates in our shampoos, and the chlorinated Tris in our couches and mattresses.
Bookmarked 2 links
Bookmarked a link: How Measurement Can Kill Your Content Marketing Strategy
Such a list depends on an effective algorithm to process it. There are three main requirements which have to be kept in balance. These are urgency, importance and psychological readiness. Traditional time management systems have tended to concentrate on the first two of these. The neglect of psychological readiness is probably the reason that most people don’t find time management systems particularly effective or congenial.
Anyone distracted in class doesn’t just lose out on the content of the discussion, they create a sense of permission that opting out is OK, and, worse, a haze of second-hand distraction for their peers. In an environment like this, students need support for the better angels of their nature (or at least the more intellectual angels), and they need defenses against the powerful short-term incentives to put off complex, frustrating tasks. That support and those defenses don’t just happen, and they are not limited to the individual’s choices. They are provided by social structure, and that structure is disproportionately provided by the professor, especially during the first weeks of class.
Ces projets de corrections, comme par exemple celui entamé par les Cantons du Valais et de Vaud pour le Rhône, s’appuient par essence sur le principe de consensus. Ce principe est un fondement du mode de vie helvétique. Il est important que les agriculteurs soient écoutés et entendus. Pour ce faire, il existe des instruments démocratiques, comme par exemple les mises à l’enquête. Utiliser le mauvais instrument, à savoir un référendum contre le modèle de financement, est contraire à l’esprit qui a construit la Suisse. Les agriculteurs ne sont qu’un prétexte de plus dans une campagne systématique de destruction de nos institutions… car même si le peuple le décide dans les urnes, l’eau ne remontera pas les rivières.
Il n’est donc pas impossible qu’une mère d’aujourd’hui soit morte en couche si elle avait dû accoucher au XVIIIe siècle. Surtout si, durant son enfance, elle a subi de graves privations de nourriture ayant perturbé son développement osseux. Ou si elle travaille comme domestique et a été violée par son patron puis contrainte d’accoucher dans un hospice. Ou encore si elle vit dans un village reculé n’offrant qu’une matrone comme option d’accompagnement. Voire si elle a déjà onze enfants. En tant que femme vivant au XXIe siècle, il est cependant beaucoup plus probable qu’elle ait subi une série d’actes médicaux inutiles ayant perturbé la naissance de son enfant. Il est bien plus vraisemblable qu’elle ait vu son accouchement accéléré, normalisé et optimisé en fonction de l’organisation du service hospitalier plutôt qu’en réponse à sa propre physiologie. Il n’est pas exclu que cette avalanche de gestes intrusifs et violents ait finalement rendu indispensable une prise en charge en urgence au bloc opératoire. Mais il est évident que, quoi qu’il soit arrivé, les médecins lui auront asséné la bouche en cœur qu’elle serait morte s’ils n’étaient pas intervenus.
It is not the responsibility of our female population to take “ X” number of steps to lessen the chance that a member of our male population will engage in untoward conduct towards them, be it assault or street harassment. As a society, we deal with violence, especially sexual violence, against women in much the wrongheaded manner that we have fought the war on drugs. We focus on the supply-side, with an emphasis on the things that women must do to “stay safe” instead of focusing on lessening mens’ “demand” to view women as purely a disposable commodity. In short, we emphasize how women can prevent being assaulted instead of telling men and boys not to assault women in the first place. Instead of condemning those who would steal the private photographs and publish them online for all to see, we condemn or belittle the women who chose to create said private photographs in the first place. Ms. Lawrence, Ms. Winstead, and the like have absolutely nothing to apologize for. They have not been scandalized, but rather victimized.
It is not Ms. Ritter’s or Ms. Dunst’s responsibility to protect their own property from theft by not creating said property or only storing it in a specific place any more than it’s any woman’s responsibility to dress a certain way, travel in groups, wear special nail polish, or what-have-you to lessen the chance that someone will attempt to assault them. As is often the case when we discuss crimes of this nature against women, we have it backwards. It is not on the (usually, but not always, female) victim to take “enough” measures to protect herself but rather on the (usually, but not always, male) victimizer to choose not to commit said crime. That notion was lost on the Disney Channel back in 2007. They treated Vanessa Hudgens like a sinful child after personal nudes were leaked and stated that “Vanessa has apologized for what was obviously a lapse in judgment. We hope she’s learned a valuable lesson.”
You may argue, without any intended malice, that it may be unwise in this day-and-age to put nude pictures of yourself on a cell phone which can be act and/or stolen. But without discounting that statement, the issue is that these women have the absolute right and privilege to put whatever they want on their cell phones with the expectation that said contents will remain private or exclusive to whomever is permitted to see them just like their male peers. The burden of moral guilt is on the people who stole said property and on those who chose to consume said stolen property for titillation and/or gratification.
Ms. Lawrence and the other victims have absolutely nothing to apologize for in terms of the contents of the photos or the nature in which they were leaked. The story itself should not be addressed as if it were a scandal, but rather what it is: A sex crime involving theft of personal property and the exploitation of the female body.
After we said goodbye, I wondered if the desire to find some grim punchline to Josh’s story speaks of the magical thinking we sometimes indulge in when it comes to sex. Surely it must be dangerous to trade it, as if it were no different to putting up a shelf? But Josh is convinced that the bargain he’s made is more than equal to the cost of escape. And, after visiting Ammanford, I too found it hard to believe that he’d have been better off staying, with his father and the amphetamines and the Tesco. There are risks in what Josh does, of course: a chance he’ll end up beaten and bitter. But I say his father should be proud of the son who refused to accept the oblivion of his hometown and is working so hard to write his own happy ending.
The only thing left for these people to do is put their toys back in the pram and huddle together as the tide rises against them, until they wake up in five year’s time and realise that Assassin’s Creed 7 was actually a pretty good game, even though they had to waste three precious seconds flicking the gender over to ‘male’ on the character creation screen so they can feel comfortable again. Change is inevitable, especially when half of the freaking gamers in the country are women and actually want to play some games that don’t treat them like disposable trash.
Headlines (Recent Posts)
- 18 mai: ne votez pas oui par ignorance (NON à l’initiative “anti-pédophiles”)
- Huit lectures pour comprendre les réseaux sociaux, cuvée 2014
- Clicker training avec son chat (dressage, éducation)
- Printemps chargé
- Ne plantez pas vos bâtons comme des bûcherons
- Getting Meals Back Under Control
- Adopting a New Cat: 10 Tips for Newbies
- L’art de la modération: donner le ton
- Comment démarrer un groupe Facebook
- Une éloge des groupes Facebook
- Le matériel de ski, c’est important
- Outrage Management and Precaution Advocacy
- The Price of Freedom
- Somewhere: Better Than LinkedIn
- The Simple Life
- Stephanie Booth on More About the M-DEX, and a Cool Blog: Hack and Hear
- Dan Schwartz, Editor, The Hearing Blog on More About the M-DEX, and a Cool Blog: Hack and Hear
- Mimi Is Making Me Dream | Open Ears on More About the M-DEX, and a Cool Blog: Hack and Hear
- Quel avenir pour la musique en bibliothèque? - on Pirater n’est pas voler, en sept mythes
- Stephanie Booth on A Blog is Not a Post, Dammit!
- Depending on my Hearing Aids | Phonak Community Blog on A Week With My Superpower
- Clicker training avec son chat (dressage, éducation) | Climb to the Stars on La détention convenable du chat d’appartement
- How to seo optimise bilingual websites on Browser Language Detection and Redirection
- Musings on Fitting Strategy (and Pricing) | phonak community blog on Le matériel de ski, c’est important
- Musings on Fitting Strategy (and Pricing) | phonak community blog on A Week With My Superpower
- "Ma tête est une machine à chercher des solutions pour ne pas avoir besoin de souffrir."
- "Time flies and the photos I’ve taken get left behind."
- "People always think getting dressed is about putting clothes on. It’s not. It’s a spell..."
- "I was outside, and the rain and the fog smelled nice. They smelled of hope, I think. They smelled..."
- "On apprend toujours mieux de ses propres erreurs que de celles des autres."