<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Need to Blog More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/20/i-need-to-blog-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/20/i-need-to-blog-more/</link>
	<description>Stephanie Booth&#039;s online ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/20/i-need-to-blog-more/#comment-16443</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1931#comment-16443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have a good point, Xavier. Yes, I&#039;m active -- but maybe not active in the way I prefer to be. One thing I&#039;m understanding with all the &quot;micro-content&quot; applications sprouting all over the place is that conversation and writing are different. I&#039;m having a lot of conversation, but I want more writing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re also right about the fact I probably need to bring into CTTS more of my &quot;offshore&quot; (;-)) activity. I&#039;m not sure how, though. I already have daily &quot;del.icio.us links&quot; posts in the feed for CTTS, and really don&#039;t want to start having &quot;tweet posts&quot; or stuff like that. Still feeling around for a solution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the end, yes, I want to write more about what I&#039;m thinking. Get the stuff out of my head. A lot of it is about blogging and social media, but not only (I guess I need to get a few things out of my system first).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point, Xavier. Yes, I&#39;m active &#8212; but maybe not active in the way I prefer to be. One thing I&#39;m understanding with all the &#8220;micro-content&#8221; applications sprouting all over the place is that conversation and writing are different. I&#39;m having a lot of conversation, but I want more writing.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>You&#39;re also right about the fact I probably need to bring into CTTS more of my &#8220;offshore&#8221; (;-)) activity. I&#39;m not sure how, though. I already have daily &#8220;del.icio.us links&#8221; posts in the feed for CTTS, and really don&#39;t want to start having &#8220;tweet posts&#8221; or stuff like that. Still feeling around for a solution.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>In the end, yes, I want to write more about what I&#39;m thinking. Get the stuff out of my head. A lot of it is about blogging and social media, but not only (I guess I need to get a few things out of my system first).</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/20/i-need-to-blog-more/#comment-16446</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1931#comment-16446</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s great that you write about the whole rationale behind your need to blog more (and it&#039;s interesting too), and I&#039;m not one to give &quot;more blogging&quot; lessons these days :) , but the devil&#039;s advocate in me feels the need to say this : &quot;don&#039;t blog about blogging!&quot;, or even &quot;don&#039;t blog about blogging more, just blog!&quot; :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Truthfully, you are way more active online than anyone I know in this part of my blogosphere, so I have a hard time see how you could do more. 6 posts in 4 weeks might not be much to you, but you&#039;re not including your tumbleblog, your seesmic conversations, your twitter ones or even your Cheese Sandwhich blog - which other, more frequent bloggers happily do - ie Embruns. I&#039;d say you&#039;d need to turn your blog into your own lifestream, à la FriendFeed but self-hosted, in order for you to see how active you are around here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the end, I think you should say &quot;I need to blog all my ideas&quot; rather than &quot;I need to blog more&quot;. As always, quality trumps quantity - and you have both, only scattered...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s great that you write about the whole rationale behind your need to blog more (and it&#39;s interesting too), and I&#39;m not one to give &#8220;more blogging&#8221; lessons these days <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  , but the devil&#39;s advocate in me feels the need to say this : &#8220;don&#39;t blog about blogging!&#8221;, or even &#8220;don&#39;t blog about blogging more, just blog!&#8221; <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>Truthfully, you are way more active online than anyone I know in this part of my blogosphere, so I have a hard time see how you could do more. 6 posts in 4 weeks might not be much to you, but you&#39;re not including your tumbleblog, your seesmic conversations, your twitter ones or even your Cheese Sandwhich blog &#8211; which other, more frequent bloggers happily do &#8211; ie Embruns. I&#39;d say you&#39;d need to turn your blog into your own lifestream, à la FriendFeed but self-hosted, in order for you to see how active you are around here.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>In the end, I think you should say &#8220;I need to blog all my ideas&#8221; rather than &#8220;I need to blog more&#8221;. As always, quality trumps quantity &#8211; and you have both, only scattered&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/20/i-need-to-blog-more/#comment-16444</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1931#comment-16444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have a good point, Xavier. Yes, I&#039;m active -- but maybe not active in the way I prefer to be. One thing I&#039;m understanding with all the &quot;micro-content&quot; applications sprouting all over the place is that conversation and writing are different. I&#039;m having a lot of conversation, but I want more writing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re also right about the fact I probably need to bring into CTTS more of my &quot;offshore&quot; (;-)) activity. I&#039;m not sure how, though. I already have daily &quot;del.icio.us links&quot; posts in the feed for CTTS, and really don&#039;t want to start having &quot;tweet posts&quot; or stuff like that. Still feeling around for a solution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the end, yes, I want to write more about what I&#039;m thinking. Get the stuff out of my head. A lot of it is about blogging and social media, but not only (I guess I need to get a few things out of my system first).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point, Xavier. Yes, I&#8217;m active &#8212; but maybe not active in the way I prefer to be. One thing I&#8217;m understanding with all the &#8220;micro-content&#8221; applications sprouting all over the place is that conversation and writing are different. I&#8217;m having a lot of conversation, but I want more writing.</p>

<p>You&#8217;re also right about the fact I probably need to bring into CTTS more of my &#8220;offshore&#8221; (;-)) activity. I&#8217;m not sure how, though. I already have daily &#8220;del.icio.us links&#8221; posts in the feed for CTTS, and really don&#8217;t want to start having &#8220;tweet posts&#8221; or stuff like that. Still feeling around for a solution.</p>

<p>In the end, yes, I want to write more about what I&#8217;m thinking. Get the stuff out of my head. A lot of it is about blogging and social media, but not only (I guess I need to get a few things out of my system first).</p>

<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/20/i-need-to-blog-more/#comment-16445</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1931#comment-16445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s great that you write about the whole rationale behind your need to blog more (and it&#039;s interesting too), and I&#039;m not one to give &quot;more blogging&quot; lessons these days :) , but the devil&#039;s advocate in me feels the need to say this : &quot;don&#039;t blog about blogging!&quot;, or even &quot;don&#039;t blog about blogging more, just blog!&quot; :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Truthfully, you are way more active online than anyone I know in this part of my blogosphere, so I have a hard time see how you could do more. 6 posts in 4 weeks might not be much to you, but you&#039;re not including your tumbleblog, your seesmic conversations, your twitter ones or even your Cheese Sandwhich blog - which other, more frequent bloggers happily do - ie Embruns. I&#039;d say you&#039;d need to turn your blog into your own lifestream, à la FriendFeed but self-hosted, in order for you to see how active you are around here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the end, I think you should say &quot;I need to blog all my ideas&quot; rather than &quot;I need to blog more&quot;. As always, quality trumps quantity - and you have both, only scattered...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that you write about the whole rationale behind your need to blog more (and it&#8217;s interesting too), and I&#8217;m not one to give &#8220;more blogging&#8221; lessons these days <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  , but the devil&#8217;s advocate in me feels the need to say this : &#8220;don&#8217;t blog about blogging!&#8221;, or even &#8220;don&#8217;t blog about blogging more, just blog!&#8221; <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>Truthfully, you are way more active online than anyone I know in this part of my blogosphere, so I have a hard time see how you could do more. 6 posts in 4 weeks might not be much to you, but you&#8217;re not including your tumbleblog, your seesmic conversations, your twitter ones or even your Cheese Sandwhich blog &#8211; which other, more frequent bloggers happily do &#8211; ie Embruns. I&#8217;d say you&#8217;d need to turn your blog into your own lifestream, à la FriendFeed but self-hosted, in order for you to see how active you are around here.</p>

<p>In the end, I think you should say &#8220;I need to blog all my ideas&#8221; rather than &#8220;I need to blog more&#8221;. As always, quality trumps quantity &#8211; and you have both, only scattered&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

