<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redirections in WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Stephanie Booth&#039;s online ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Look for CTTS: Thesis &#8212; Climb to the Stars</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16441</link>
		<dc:creator>New Look for CTTS: Thesis &#8212; Climb to the Stars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] This Site with the simple word &#8220;About&#8221;. Basically, this achieves the same thing as the &#8220;redirect to&#8221; page template that I&#8217;m using on the Going Solo site, for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This Site with the simple word &#8220;About&#8221;. Basically, this achieves the same thing as the &#8220;redirect to&#8221; page template that I&#8217;m using on the Going Solo site, for [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: le blog à Ollie &#187; Liens du jour</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16440</link>
		<dc:creator>le blog à Ollie &#187; Liens du jour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Redirection plugin pour WordPress. Via Climb to the Stars. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Redirection plugin pour WordPress. Via Climb to the Stars. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie-Aude</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16435</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie-Aude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16435</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And many 302 are also considered with suspicion by Google, as it was a technic mainly used in &quot;black hat&quot; redirections&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And many 302 are also considered with suspicion by Google, as it was a technic mainly used in &#8220;black hat&#8221; redirections</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie-Aude</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16439</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie-Aude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And many 302 are also considered with suspicion by Google, as it was a technic mainly used in &quot;black hat&quot; redirections&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And many 302 are also considered with suspicion by Google, as it was a technic mainly used in &#8220;black hat&#8221; redirections</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspar</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16434</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;301 is a &#039;permanent redirect&#039; and 302 is temporary.  When google sees a 301 it knows it should forget the old URL and index the new one.  When it sees a 302 it assumes the content will return to the old one and not index the new one as comprehensively.&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d always go for a 301.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>301 is a &#39;permanent redirect&#39; and 302 is temporary.  When google sees a 301 it knows it should forget the old URL and index the new one.  When it sees a 302 it assumes the content will return to the old one and not index the new one as comprehensively.<br />I&#39;d always go for a 301.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16437</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re right... I&#039;m a bit confused, I remembered seeing somewhere to use 302 instead of 301, which surprised me, but the explanation (now forgotten) seemed solid, so I filed the information away in my memory. When writing this post I&#039;ve been incapable of laying my hands on my initial source. My research seems to point, as you indicate, to using 301 instead of 302.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Extra information, anybody?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#39;re right&#8230; I&#39;m a bit confused, I remembered seeing somewhere to use 302 instead of 301, which surprised me, but the explanation (now forgotten) seemed solid, so I filed the information away in my memory. When writing this post I&#39;ve been incapable of laying my hands on my initial source. My research seems to point, as you indicate, to using 301 instead of 302.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>Extra information, anybody?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspar</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16433</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16433</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;301 is a &#039;permanent redirect&#039; and 302 is temporary.  When google sees a 301 it knows it should forget the old URL and index the new one.  When it sees a 302 it assumes the content will return to the old one and not index the new one as comprehensively.
I&#039;d always go for a 301.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>301 is a &#8216;permanent redirect&#8217; and 302 is temporary.  When google sees a 301 it knows it should forget the old URL and index the new one.  When it sees a 302 it assumes the content will return to the old one and not index the new one as comprehensively.
I&#8217;d always go for a 301.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16432</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re right... I&#039;m a bit confused, I remembered seeing somewhere to use 302 instead of 301, which surprised me, but the explanation (now forgotten) seemed solid, so I filed the information away in my memory. When writing this post I&#039;ve been incapable of laying my hands on my initial source. My research seems to point, as you indicate, to using 301 instead of 302.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Extra information, anybody?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right&#8230; I&#8217;m a bit confused, I remembered seeing somewhere to use 302 instead of 301, which surprised me, but the explanation (now forgotten) seemed solid, so I filed the information away in my memory. When writing this post I&#8217;ve been incapable of laying my hands on my initial source. My research seems to point, as you indicate, to using 301 instead of 302.</p>

<p>Extra information, anybody?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie-Aude</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16436</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie-Aude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16436</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you prefer a 302 ? It is not taken in account by Google, when using a 301 it will index your new page ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you prefer a 302 ? It is not taken in account by Google, when using a 301 it will index your new page &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie-Aude</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/07/18/redirections-in-wordpress/#comment-16438</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie-Aude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/?p=1923#comment-16438</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you prefer a 302 ? It is not taken in account by Google, when using a 301 it will index your new page ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you prefer a 302 ? It is not taken in account by Google, when using a 301 it will index your new page &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

