<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Against Threaded Conversations on Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/</link>
	<description>Stephanie Booth&#039;s online ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In support of threaded discussions and blog comments &#187; Periodic Fable</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-27929</link>
		<dc:creator>In support of threaded discussions and blog comments &#187; Periodic Fable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-27929</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]  by HelenW   Jun 05 2008  TrackBack Address. Stephanie Booth recently posted an argument against threaded conversations on blogs. I have to say that I disagree to a large extent with what she says as well as the people she [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  by HelenW   Jun 05 2008  TrackBack Address. Stephanie Booth recently posted an argument against threaded conversations on blogs. I have to say that I disagree to a large extent with what she says as well as the people she [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversation in Comments vs. Conversation in Twitter — Climb to the Stars</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-27187</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversation in Comments vs. Conversation in Twitter — Climb to the Stars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-27187</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] This, by the way, is also the root of my dislike of threaded conversations on blogs. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This, by the way, is also the root of my dislike of threaded conversations on blogs. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le développement de WordPress 2.7 &#124; Mounik</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16359</link>
		<dc:creator>Le développement de WordPress 2.7 &#124; Mounik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] comments) et nouvelle API wp_list_comments() (ndX : à chacun de voir si c’est une bonne chose ou pas) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comments) et nouvelle API wp_list_comments() (ndX : à chacun de voir si c’est une bonne chose ou pas) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suivre à la trace le développement de WordPress 2.7 &#124; WordPress Francophone</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16358</link>
		<dc:creator>Suivre à la trace le développement de WordPress 2.7 &#124; WordPress Francophone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16358</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] et nouvelle API wp_list_comments() (ndX : à chacun de voir si c&#8217;est une bonne chose ou pas) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] et nouvelle API wp_list_comments() (ndX : à chacun de voir si c&#8217;est une bonne chose ou pas) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Krebs</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16354</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Krebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16354</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you don&#039;t want many comments (and therefore ban threaded discussions), there is a more powerfull way: ban discussions and close comments (such in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/2008/06/09/Football&quot;&gt;http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/20...&lt;/a&gt; ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(of course your others arguments are laughtables)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#39;t want many comments (and therefore ban threaded discussions), there is a more powerfull way: ban discussions and close comments (such in this <a href="http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/2008/06/09/Football">http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/20&#8230;</a> ).</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>(of course your others arguments are laughtables)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Krebs</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16342</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Krebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you don&#039;t want many comments (and therefore ban threaded discussions), there is a more powerfull way: ban discussions and close comments (such in this http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/2008/06/09/Football ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(of course your others arguments are laughtables)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t want many comments (and therefore ban threaded discussions), there is a more powerfull way: ban discussions and close comments (such in this <a href="http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/2008/06/09/Football" rel="nofollow">http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/?post/2008/06/09/Football</a> ).</p>

<p>(of course your others arguments are laughtables)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacky</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16349</link>
		<dc:creator>blacky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Steph: I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s always the case. Or rather: I doubt it makes a large difference. Some topics obviously are more prone to discussion fragmentation. Making clear (in the blog post) what the point is helps much more. As for broad topics, I tend to make them seperate postings in a series, possibly with a conclusive/wrap-up/minutes type of post at the end. Sure, this pre-fragments the discussion, but sometimes making points individually is better than having them all in one discussion and going nowhere with it. A panel discussion is probably very similar in this regard, but it&#039;s a bit harder to moderate since everything is realtime.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bottom line: I think the positive aspects of threaded discussions outweigh the negative sides. But that naturally is something blog owners should decided for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph: I&#39;m not sure that&#39;s always the case. Or rather: I doubt it makes a large difference. Some topics obviously are more prone to discussion fragmentation. Making clear (in the blog post) what the point is helps much more. As for broad topics, I tend to make them seperate postings in a series, possibly with a conclusive/wrap-up/minutes type of post at the end. Sure, this pre-fragments the discussion, but sometimes making points individually is better than having them all in one discussion and going nowhere with it. A panel discussion is probably very similar in this regard, but it&#39;s a bit harder to moderate since everything is realtime.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>Bottom line: I think the positive aspects of threaded discussions outweigh the negative sides. But that naturally is something blog owners should decided for themselves.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacky</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16357</link>
		<dc:creator>blacky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Steph: I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s always the case. Or rather: I doubt it makes a large difference. Some topics obviously are more prone to discussion fragmentation. Making clear (in the blog post) what the point is helps much more. As for broad topics, I tend to make them seperate postings in a series, possibly with a conclusive/wrap-up/minutes type of post at the end. Sure, this pre-fragments the discussion, but sometimes making points individually is better than having them all in one discussion and going nowhere with it. A panel discussion is probably very similar in this regard, but it&#039;s a bit harder to moderate since everything is realtime.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bottom line: I think the positive aspects of threaded discussions outweigh the negative sides. But that naturally is something blog owners should decided for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph: I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s always the case. Or rather: I doubt it makes a large difference. Some topics obviously are more prone to discussion fragmentation. Making clear (in the blog post) what the point is helps much more. As for broad topics, I tend to make them seperate postings in a series, possibly with a conclusive/wrap-up/minutes type of post at the end. Sure, this pre-fragments the discussion, but sometimes making points individually is better than having them all in one discussion and going nowhere with it. A panel discussion is probably very similar in this regard, but it&#8217;s a bit harder to moderate since everything is realtime.</p>

<p>Bottom line: I think the positive aspects of threaded discussions outweigh the negative sides. But that naturally is something blog owners should decided for themselves.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16348</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16348</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;blacky: one of my points here is that if you provide threaded comments, you &lt;em&gt;encourage&lt;/em&gt; conversations to go off on tangents.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blacky: one of my points here is that if you provide threaded comments, you <em>encourage</em> conversations to go off on tangents.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16347</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/06/02/against-threaded-conversations-on-blogs/#comment-16347</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;HI Christophe, when I say export my data, I mean export the comments that I wrote -- strictly speaking, the content that I added to the system. Just like del.icio.us allows you to export all your saved links (and comments/tags on them) into a big HTML/XML file. This does not include the tracking data or content created by other people.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Christophe, when I say export my data, I mean export the comments that I wrote &#8212; strictly speaking, the content that I added to the system. Just like del.icio.us allows you to export all your saved links (and comments/tags on them) into a big HTML/XML file. This does not include the tracking data or content created by other people.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

