<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FriendFeed Appeals to Women, Too!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/</link>
	<description>Stephanie Booth&#039;s online ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: From the Pipeline - 3.14.08 — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-18979</link>
		<dc:creator>From the Pipeline - 3.14.08 — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-18979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] FriendFeed Appeals to Women, Too! :: Climbing to the Stars - Duncan may not have a clue about FriendFeed but Stephanie is quick to point out that there are a lot of women that do. Maybe TechCrunch needs a woman writer who gets it [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FriendFeed Appeals to Women, Too! :: Climbing to the Stars &#8211; Duncan may not have a clue about FriendFeed but Stephanie is quick to point out that there are a lot of women that do. Maybe TechCrunch needs a woman writer who gets it [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jannifer Stoddard</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannifer Stoddard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16999</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;m fairly new to FriendFeed and I have to say I wish I&#8217;d found it sooner!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;http://friendfeed.com/wordsforliving\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;http://friendfeed.com/wordsforliving&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fairly new to FriendFeed and I have to say I wish I&#8217;d found it sooner!</p>

<p><a href=\"http://friendfeed.com/wordsforliving\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://friendfeed.com/wordsforliving</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16121</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Andrea: I don&#039;t have the feeling that FriendFeed is ignoring women. My post was simply a reaction to a list of &quot;representative reading&quot; of a given blogger -- and noting that there weren&#039;t many women in it. That&#039;s all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea: I don&#39;t have the feeling that FriendFeed is ignoring women. My post was simply a reaction to a list of &#8220;representative reading&#8221; of a given blogger &#8212; and noting that there weren&#39;t many women in it. That&#39;s all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Baker</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16120</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for speaking up. Its not just friendfeed that is ignoring the women. There are a lot of woman in technology and we need to get our voices heard too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW I am on there as well. I strive to be publicly influential one day. You know, beyond my company ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://friendfeed.com/immunity&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for speaking up. Its not just friendfeed that is ignoring the women. There are a lot of woman in technology and we need to get our voices heard too.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>BTW I am on there as well. I strive to be publicly influential one day. You know, beyond my company <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><br /></p>

<p><a href="http://friendfeed.com/immunity" rel="nofollow">http://friendfeed.com/immunity</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16097</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16097</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Andrea: I don&#039;t have the feeling that FriendFeed is ignoring women. My post was simply a reaction to a list of &quot;representative reading&quot; of a given blogger -- and noting that there weren&#039;t many women in it. That&#039;s all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea: I don&#8217;t have the feeling that FriendFeed is ignoring women. My post was simply a reaction to a list of &#8220;representative reading&#8221; of a given blogger &#8212; and noting that there weren&#8217;t many women in it. That&#8217;s all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Baker</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16098</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16098</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for speaking up. Its not just friendfeed that is ignoring the women. There are a lot of woman in technology and we need to get our voices heard too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW I am on there as well. I strive to be publicly influential one day. You know, beyond my company ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://friendfeed.com/immunity&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for speaking up. Its not just friendfeed that is ignoring the women. There are a lot of woman in technology and we need to get our voices heard too.</p>

<p>BTW I am on there as well. I strive to be publicly influential one day. You know, beyond my company <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><a href="http://friendfeed.com/immunity" rel="nofollow">http://friendfeed.com/immunity</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gia</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16119</link>
		<dc:creator>gia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16119</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stephanie, I&#039;d say it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a boys&#039; club, but I think they&#039;re only influential to themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Guardian recently published what they thought were the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/09/blogs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;50 Most Influential Blogs&lt;/a&gt; and though many of them are obvious inclusions, there were several &#039;new&#039; ones which were nice to see on the list (eg &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefword.org.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The F Word&lt;/a&gt;). There were also some notable &lt;em&gt;exclusions&lt;/em&gt; (eg Scoble). As most of the people reading that article aren&#039;t in the blogging &#039;clique&#039;, the list provides a good cross of &#039;popular&#039; and &#039;good&#039; whilst staying away from the &#039;oh-we&#039;d-better-include-him-because-he&#039;s-an-elite-blogger&#039; decisions we&#039;re used to putting up with. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie, I&#39;d say it <em>is</em> a boys&#39; club, but I think they&#39;re only influential to themselves.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>The Guardian recently published what they thought were the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/09/blogs" rel="nofollow">50 Most Influential Blogs</a> and though many of them are obvious inclusions, there were several &#39;new&#39; ones which were nice to see on the list (eg <a href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">The F Word</a>). There were also some notable <em>exclusions</em> (eg Scoble). As most of the people reading that article aren&#39;t in the blogging &#39;clique&#39;, the list provides a good cross of &#39;popular&#39; and &#39;good&#39; whilst staying away from the &#39;oh-we&#39;d-better-include-him-because-he&#39;s-an-elite-blogger&#39; decisions we&#39;re used to putting up with. <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m Not Reading and Engaging With Enough Female Bloggers &#124; Feeds Log</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16099</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m Not Reading and Engaging With Enough Female Bloggers &#124; Feeds Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] yesterday, Stephanie Booth (FriendFeed Link) took things a big step forward when she wrote, &#8220;FriendFeed Appeals to Women, Too!&#8220;, recognizing the imbalance and posting a list of 16 female bloggers, along with their [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yesterday, Stephanie Booth (FriendFeed Link) took things a big step forward when she wrote, &#8220;FriendFeed Appeals to Women, Too!&#8220;, recognizing the imbalance and posting a list of 16 female bloggers, along with their [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gia</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16100</link>
		<dc:creator>gia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stephanie, I&#039;d say it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a boys&#039; club, but I think they&#039;re only influential to themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Guardian recently published what they thought were the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/09/blogs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;50 Most Influential Blogs&lt;/a&gt; and though many of them are obvious inclusions, there were several &#039;new&#039; ones which were nice to see on the list (eg &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefword.org.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The F Word&lt;/a&gt;). There were also some notable &lt;em&gt;exclusions&lt;/em&gt; (eg Scoble). As most of the people reading that article aren&#039;t in the blogging &#039;clique&#039;, the list provides a good cross of &#039;popular&#039; and &#039;good&#039; whilst staying away from the &#039;oh-we&#039;d-better-include-him-because-he&#039;s-an-elite-blogger&#039; decisions we&#039;re used to putting up with. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie, I&#8217;d say it <em>is</em> a boys&#8217; club, but I think they&#8217;re only influential to themselves.</p>

<p>The Guardian recently published what they thought were the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/09/blogs" rel="nofollow">50 Most Influential Blogs</a> and though many of them are obvious inclusions, there were several &#8216;new&#8217; ones which were nice to see on the list (eg <a href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">The F Word</a>). There were also some notable <em>exclusions</em> (eg Scoble). As most of the people reading that article aren&#8217;t in the blogging &#8216;clique&#8217;, the list provides a good cross of &#8216;popular&#8217; and &#8216;good&#8217; whilst staying away from the &#8216;oh-we&#8217;d-better-include-him-because-he&#8217;s-an-elite-blogger&#8217; decisions we&#8217;re used to putting up with. <img src='http://climbtothestars.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Isn&#8217;t Feminism, It&#8217;s Technology &#124; SheGeeks</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16101</link>
		<dc:creator>This Isn&#8217;t Feminism, It&#8217;s Technology &#124; SheGeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2008/03/14/friendfeed-appeals-to-women-too/#comment-16101</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] light of recent posts and discussions surrounding Susan Merit and Stephanie Booth&#8217;s responses to Louis Gray&#8217;s &quot;elite&quot; FriendFeed list not having an equally proportionate [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] light of recent posts and discussions surrounding Susan Merit and Stephanie Booth&#8217;s responses to Louis Gray&#8217;s &quot;elite&quot; FriendFeed list not having an equally proportionate [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

