http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/ Stephanie Booth's online ramblings. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:27:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-431266 Suw Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:55:13 +0000 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-431266 <p>Don't forget you can always ask permission. Creative Commons licenses specify what you can do without having to ask permission, but they do not prevent you asking permission to do something not covered by the license.</p> Don't forget you can always ask permission. Creative Commons licenses specify what you can do without having to ask permission, but they do not prevent you asking permission to do something not covered by the license.

]]> http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-140357 Suw Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:55:13 +0000 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-140357 <p>Don't forget you can always ask permission. Creative Commons licenses specify what you can do without having to ask permission, but they do not prevent you asking permission to do something not covered by the license.</p> Don’t forget you can always ask permission. Creative Commons licenses specify what you can do without having to ask permission, but they do not prevent you asking permission to do something not covered by the license.

]]> http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-431265 la langouste Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:07:09 +0000 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-431265 <p>"Non commercial" does not mean "non profit", the bare act of selling something is commercial even if you loose money. I think most people who put their contents under a non commercial licence want to prevent big profits realized by big, bad capitalist companies and do not realize that the nc licence is much more restrictive than that.</p> “Non commercial” does not mean “non profit”, the bare act of selling something is commercial even if you loose money. I think most people who put their contents under a non commercial licence want to prevent big profits realized by big, bad capitalist companies and do not realize that the nc licence is much more restrictive than that.

]]> http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-140077 la langouste Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:07:09 +0000 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/09/creative-commons-and-ads-on-blogs/#comment-140077 <p>"Non commercial" does not mean "non profit", the bare act of selling something is commercial even if you loose money. I think most people who put their contents under a non commercial licence want to prevent big profits realized by big, bad capitalist companies and do not realize that the nc licence is much more restrictive than that.</p> “Non commercial” does not mean “non profit”, the bare act of selling something is commercial even if you loose money. I think most people who put their contents under a non commercial licence want to prevent big profits realized by big, bad capitalist companies and do not realize that the nc licence is much more restrictive than that.

]]>