http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2002/03/21/google-bombing/ Stephanie Booth's online ramblings. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:14:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2002/03/21/google-bombing/#comment-430940 Bob the Builder Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:58:00 +0000 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2002/03/21/google-bombing/#comment-430940 <p>Google Bombing works only if you are trusted by your peers (unless you <br>have money and can do what Scientology (and others I'm sure) do [1] aka <br>simulation of peer approval).<br> Google ranking is based on the assumption that every author will <em>only</em> <br>link to valuable information. Some kind of a democratic ranking, in a way.<br> Hence, an author can abuse once or twice the Google ranking, but after <br>that, readers-peers won't trust him (aka link to you) anymore et voilà , no <br>more easy google bombing via weblogs for that particular author.<br> [1] <a href="http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/">http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/</a></p> Google Bombing works only if you are trusted by your peers (unless you
have money and can do what Scientology (and others I'm sure) do [1] aka
simulation of peer approval).
Google ranking is based on the assumption that every author will only
link to valuable information. Some kind of a democratic ranking, in a way.
Hence, an author can abuse once or twice the Google ranking, but after
that, readers-peers won't trust him (aka link to you) anymore et voilà , no
more easy google bombing via weblogs for that particular author.
[1] http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/

]]> http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2002/03/21/google-bombing/#comment-444 Bob the Builder Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2002/03/21/google-bombing/#comment-444 <p>Google Bombing works only if you are trusted by your peers (unless you have money and can do what Scientology (and others I'm sure) do [1] aka simulation of peer approval). Google ranking is based on the assumption that every author will <em>only</em> link to valuable information. Some kind of a democratic ranking, in a way. Hence, an author can abuse once or twice the Google ranking, but after that, readers-peers won't trust him (aka link to you) anymore et voilà , no more easy google bombing via weblogs for that particular author. [1] <a href="http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/" rel="nofollow">http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/</a></p> Google Bombing works only if you are trusted by your peers (unless you
have money and can do what Scientology (and others I’m sure) do [1] aka
simulation of peer approval).
Google ranking is based on the assumption that every author will only
link to valuable information. Some kind of a democratic ranking, in a way.
Hence, an author can abuse once or twice the Google ranking, but after
that, readers-peers won’t trust him (aka link to you) anymore et voilà , no
more easy google bombing via weblogs for that particular author.
[1] http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/

]]>