A very interesting article about Google bombing. Needless to say, I don’t encourage abuse of a (reasonably) good system.
On the other hand, were is the line between use and abuse? What is ethical, what is not? The gray zone is always the most interesting.
[link via Emmanuelle]
Similar Posts:
- Daniela Cerqui — Cyborgs: what kind of human being are we building? [en] (2007)
- Scientology [en] (2002)
- Mail [en] (2001)
- BonniNet [en] (2002)
- Ziki: Aborted Sign-Up [en] (2006)
- Temple Grandin and McDonald's [en] (2003)
- 911 Stuff [en] (2001)
- Dealing with Spammers [en] (2000)
- Why I End Up Sharing Without Reading [en] (2013)
- Net-awareness [en] (2001)
Google Bombing works only if you are trusted by your peers (unless you
have money and can do what Scientology (and others I’m sure) do [1] aka
simulation of peer approval).
Google ranking is based on the assumption that every author will _only_
link to valuable information. Some kind of a democratic ranking, in a way.
Hence, an author can abuse once or twice the Google ranking, but after
that, readers-peers won’t trust him (aka link to you) anymore et voilà , no
more easy google bombing via weblogs for that particular author.
[1] http://www.operatingthetan.com/google/