<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paroles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/</link>
	<description>Stephanie Booth's online ramblings.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-430153</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-430153</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the core of Dali&#39;s work is the "paranoiac-critical method". Basically, it &lt;br&gt;has to do with producing meaning out of "nothing".&lt;br&gt; Once you&#39;ve grasped that, things become a lot easier to understand.&lt;br&gt; There are a certain number of "obsessions" in his paintings and writings &lt;br&gt;(soft figures, grasshoppers, l&#39;Angélus, rhino horns, etc, etc.) And they &lt;br&gt;are "set up" in such a way as to create coherence - when there is &lt;br&gt;coherence only in Dali&#39;s mind.&lt;br&gt; He&#39;s one of my exam subjects in French. First I read his writing, and &lt;br&gt;thought "oh gosh. What does that mean?" Then I spent a couple of days &lt;br&gt;staring at his paintings. Then I went back to the texts, and things &lt;br&gt;started falling into place.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the core of Dali&#39;s work is the &#8220;paranoiac-critical method&#8221;. Basically, it <br />has to do with producing meaning out of &#8220;nothing&#8221;.<br /> Once you&#39;ve grasped that, things become a lot easier to understand.<br /> There are a certain number of &#8220;obsessions&#8221; in his paintings and writings <br />(soft figures, grasshoppers, l&#39;Angélus, rhino horns, etc, etc.) And they <br />are &#8220;set up&#8221; in such a way as to create coherence - when there is <br />coherence only in Dali&#39;s mind.<br /> He&#39;s one of my exam subjects in French. First I read his writing, and <br />thought &#8220;oh gosh. What does that mean?&#8221; Then I spent a couple of days <br />staring at his paintings. Then I went back to the texts, and things <br />started falling into place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-430152</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-430152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve always liked Dali&#39;s work, but I can&#39;t imagine what he was thinking &lt;br&gt;when painting.  Some of his works mean nothing to me, mere images, and &lt;br&gt;some speak of wonders untold.  I find that with much art, its significance &lt;br&gt;and importance is a purely subjective matter, justifiable only by the one &lt;br&gt;observing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always liked Dali&#39;s work, but I can&#39;t imagine what he was thinking <br />when painting.  Some of his works mean nothing to me, mere images, and <br />some speak of wonders untold.  I find that with much art, its significance <br />and importance is a purely subjective matter, justifiable only by the one <br />observing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've always liked Dali's work, but I can't imagine what he was thinking 
when painting.  Some of his works mean nothing to me, mere images, and 
some speak of wonders untold.  I find that with much art, its significance 
and importance is a purely subjective matter, justifiable only by the one 
observing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always liked Dali&#8217;s work, but I can&#8217;t imagine what he was thinking<br />
when painting.  Some of his works mean nothing to me, mere images, and<br />
some speak of wonders untold.  I find that with much art, its significance<br />
and importance is a purely subjective matter, justifiable only by the one<br />
observing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2001/06/10/paroles/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the core of Dali's work is the "paranoiac-critical method". Basically, it 
has to do with producing meaning out of "nothing".
 Once you've grasped that, things become a lot easier to understand.
 There are a certain number of "obsessions" in his paintings and writings 
(soft figures, grasshoppers, l'Angélus, rhino horns, etc, etc.) And they 
are "set up" in such a way as to create coherence - when there is 
coherence only in Dali's mind.
 He's one of my exam subjects in French. First I read his writing, and 
thought "oh gosh. What does that mean?" Then I spent a couple of days 
staring at his paintings. Then I went back to the texts, and things 
started falling into place.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the core of Dali&#8217;s work is the &#8220;paranoiac-critical method&#8221;. Basically, it<br />
has to do with producing meaning out of &#8220;nothing&#8221;.<br />
 Once you&#8217;ve grasped that, things become a lot easier to understand.<br />
 There are a certain number of &#8220;obsessions&#8221; in his paintings and writings<br />
(soft figures, grasshoppers, l&#8217;Angélus, rhino horns, etc, etc.) And they<br />
are &#8220;set up&#8221; in such a way as to create coherence - when there is<br />
coherence only in Dali&#8217;s mind.<br />
 He&#8217;s one of my exam subjects in French. First I read his writing, and<br />
thought &#8220;oh gosh. What does that mean?&#8221; Then I spent a couple of days<br />
staring at his paintings. Then I went back to the texts, and things<br />
started falling into place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
