[...] Car la lumière n’éclaire pas tous les chemins
Pascal Obispo, Pas de regrets
[...] Car la lumière n’éclaire pas tous les chemins
Pascal Obispo, Pas de regrets
Bookmarked 2 links
Bookmarked a link: How Measurement Can Kill Your Content Marketing Strategy
Such a list depends on an effective algorithm to process it. There are three main requirements which have to be kept in balance. These are urgency, importance and psychological readiness. Traditional time management systems have tended to concentrate on the first two of these. The neglect of psychological readiness is probably the reason that most people don’t find time management systems particularly effective or congenial.
Anyone distracted in class doesn’t just lose out on the content of the discussion, they create a sense of permission that opting out is OK, and, worse, a haze of second-hand distraction for their peers. In an environment like this, students need support for the better angels of their nature (or at least the more intellectual angels), and they need defenses against the powerful short-term incentives to put off complex, frustrating tasks. That support and those defenses don’t just happen, and they are not limited to the individual’s choices. They are provided by social structure, and that structure is disproportionately provided by the professor, especially during the first weeks of class.
Ces projets de corrections, comme par exemple celui entamé par les Cantons du Valais et de Vaud pour le Rhône, s’appuient par essence sur le principe de consensus. Ce principe est un fondement du mode de vie helvétique. Il est important que les agriculteurs soient écoutés et entendus. Pour ce faire, il existe des instruments démocratiques, comme par exemple les mises à l’enquête. Utiliser le mauvais instrument, à savoir un référendum contre le modèle de financement, est contraire à l’esprit qui a construit la Suisse. Les agriculteurs ne sont qu’un prétexte de plus dans une campagne systématique de destruction de nos institutions… car même si le peuple le décide dans les urnes, l’eau ne remontera pas les rivières.
Il n’est donc pas impossible qu’une mère d’aujourd’hui soit morte en couche si elle avait dû accoucher au XVIIIe siècle. Surtout si, durant son enfance, elle a subi de graves privations de nourriture ayant perturbé son développement osseux. Ou si elle travaille comme domestique et a été violée par son patron puis contrainte d’accoucher dans un hospice. Ou encore si elle vit dans un village reculé n’offrant qu’une matrone comme option d’accompagnement. Voire si elle a déjà onze enfants. En tant que femme vivant au XXIe siècle, il est cependant beaucoup plus probable qu’elle ait subi une série d’actes médicaux inutiles ayant perturbé la naissance de son enfant. Il est bien plus vraisemblable qu’elle ait vu son accouchement accéléré, normalisé et optimisé en fonction de l’organisation du service hospitalier plutôt qu’en réponse à sa propre physiologie. Il n’est pas exclu que cette avalanche de gestes intrusifs et violents ait finalement rendu indispensable une prise en charge en urgence au bloc opératoire. Mais il est évident que, quoi qu’il soit arrivé, les médecins lui auront asséné la bouche en cœur qu’elle serait morte s’ils n’étaient pas intervenus.
It is not the responsibility of our female population to take “ X” number of steps to lessen the chance that a member of our male population will engage in untoward conduct towards them, be it assault or street harassment. As a society, we deal with violence, especially sexual violence, against women in much the wrongheaded manner that we have fought the war on drugs. We focus on the supply-side, with an emphasis on the things that women must do to “stay safe” instead of focusing on lessening mens’ “demand” to view women as purely a disposable commodity. In short, we emphasize how women can prevent being assaulted instead of telling men and boys not to assault women in the first place. Instead of condemning those who would steal the private photographs and publish them online for all to see, we condemn or belittle the women who chose to create said private photographs in the first place. Ms. Lawrence, Ms. Winstead, and the like have absolutely nothing to apologize for. They have not been scandalized, but rather victimized.
It is not Ms. Ritter’s or Ms. Dunst’s responsibility to protect their own property from theft by not creating said property or only storing it in a specific place any more than it’s any woman’s responsibility to dress a certain way, travel in groups, wear special nail polish, or what-have-you to lessen the chance that someone will attempt to assault them. As is often the case when we discuss crimes of this nature against women, we have it backwards. It is not on the (usually, but not always, female) victim to take “enough” measures to protect herself but rather on the (usually, but not always, male) victimizer to choose not to commit said crime. That notion was lost on the Disney Channel back in 2007. They treated Vanessa Hudgens like a sinful child after personal nudes were leaked and stated that “Vanessa has apologized for what was obviously a lapse in judgment. We hope she’s learned a valuable lesson.”
You may argue, without any intended malice, that it may be unwise in this day-and-age to put nude pictures of yourself on a cell phone which can be act and/or stolen. But without discounting that statement, the issue is that these women have the absolute right and privilege to put whatever they want on their cell phones with the expectation that said contents will remain private or exclusive to whomever is permitted to see them just like their male peers. The burden of moral guilt is on the people who stole said property and on those who chose to consume said stolen property for titillation and/or gratification.
Ms. Lawrence and the other victims have absolutely nothing to apologize for in terms of the contents of the photos or the nature in which they were leaked. The story itself should not be addressed as if it were a scandal, but rather what it is: A sex crime involving theft of personal property and the exploitation of the female body.
After we said goodbye, I wondered if the desire to find some grim punchline to Josh’s story speaks of the magical thinking we sometimes indulge in when it comes to sex. Surely it must be dangerous to trade it, as if it were no different to putting up a shelf? But Josh is convinced that the bargain he’s made is more than equal to the cost of escape. And, after visiting Ammanford, I too found it hard to believe that he’d have been better off staying, with his father and the amphetamines and the Tesco. There are risks in what Josh does, of course: a chance he’ll end up beaten and bitter. But I say his father should be proud of the son who refused to accept the oblivion of his hometown and is working so hard to write his own happy ending.
The only thing left for these people to do is put their toys back in the pram and huddle together as the tide rises against them, until they wake up in five year’s time and realise that Assassin’s Creed 7 was actually a pretty good game, even though they had to waste three precious seconds flicking the gender over to ‘male’ on the character creation screen so they can feel comfortable again. Change is inevitable, especially when half of the freaking gamers in the country are women and actually want to play some games that don’t treat them like disposable trash.
This isn’t the first time this sort of thing has happened, of course. This crap just keeps going. People who proudly call themselves “gamers” everywhere have been harassing and trying to exclude women for the last ten years, citing every pathetic excuse in the book from a “feminist agenda” to “gamer culture is under attack”. It’s disgusting and it’s awful, and it doesn’t even make sense. What are these people even afraid of?
How could I see something like this so differently as someone with whom we clearly related in terms of the vision of our boy filled families? I had to see if I was the anomaly, so I sounded out a bunch of dads. Their attitudes were like mine—their sons were venturing in as early as 4 years old, and certainly were autonomous pros by 7 or 8. The dads I talked to had no concern about predators, their leading concern was cleanliness.
It’s an archetype, I realized, that taps into a particular male fantasy: of being saved from depression and ennui by a fantasy woman who sweeps in like a glittery breeze to save you from yourself, then disappears once her work is done.
Posted 2 comments
Maybe nothing, and maybe your carousel is working. I know we’ve created some great ones for clients. But take another look at it. Ask yourself (or maybe someone without a vested interest in your website) whether your carousel works for you, or whether it’s annoying users and reducing visibility. Is your carousel converting or is banner blindness taking over instead? If you don’t know, check your analytics. The answer is already there.
I called out to some as they left, ‘Can’t you even listen to ideas you disagree with? In Oxford, of all places, you should be open-minded enough to hear alternative views’. But no. They said I needed an open mind. This really got to me, raising painful memories of my early research on psychics and clairvoyants who said, ‘You just don’t have an open mind,’ when my careful experiments showed no psychic powers. By the time I moved on to showing Internet memes and viral videos more than half the audience was gone.
I explained the idea of religions as memeplexes: they package up a set of doctrines, tell believers to learn them, to pass them on, to have faith and not doubt, and they ensure obedience with fearsome threats and ridiculous promises. This I illustrated with images of Christian heaven and hell. Then I read from the Koran “those that have faith and do good works, Allah will admit them to gardens watered by running streams … pearls and bracelets of gold.” “Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. They shall be lashed with rods of iron.” More walked out. By the time I arrived at a slide calling religions (Richard’s fault!) ‘Viruses of the mind’, the lecture hall was looking rather empty.
Her domain of expertise is online culture and communication (or "social media consultant/strategist", or whatever the hot name for all this web 2.0 stuff is these days). Ask her if you want to know more about what she does.
Read more exciting details about her life and Climb to the Stars, where she has been blogging for the last 10 years.